THE ROLE OF THE RECREATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE PROCESS OF ACTUALIZATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF A TEENAGER
Abstract
The approaches to studying recreation as a process are generalized, conceptual approaches are systematized, and key features of meaningful recreation are identified: building social relationships subjective experience’s conceptualization with the mastery of new psychosocial constructs; increasing communicative competence, developing social intelligence, and increasing general indicators of well-being; improving health and preventing diseases, improving interpersonal communication and social integration skills. Purpose – to present а new approach to working with children in a recreational and developmental environment is developed based on the concept of personality development, which takes into account psychosocial, cultural-intellectual, and neurophysiological aspects, combined with an individual approach to the personality. Methods: sociometric survey (J. Moreno) (Zlobina, 2003); diagnostics of “Emotional Intelligence” (N. Hall). Results. Close cross-connections between the results of the methods in samples 1 and 2 were noted, which showed the quantitative dynamics of changes in indicators before and after the implementation of the work program with adolescents, which proves the effectiveness and relevance of the methods application and forms of the individual’s psychological potential actualization program. Conclusions. The application of the adolescent’s psychological potential activating technology is substantiated and the main stages of its implementation are revealed. The implementation of the adolescent’s psychological potential activating technology is interpreted as emphasizing the relevance of organizing a recreational and developmental space for comprehensive development, the psychological potential actualization and ensuring the need for recovery in psychosocial, cultural-intellectual and neurophysiological aspects. It has been proven that an approach to working with adolescents that takes into account the psychosocial, cultural-intellectual and neurophysiological aspects of the recreational and developmental environment, combined with an individual approach, a cycle of transformational interaction, the use of technology for activating psychological potential, the peer-to-peer method, is an important tool for actualizing the psychological potential of an adolescent.
References
2. Євдокимова Н., Тарасова Н. Особливості мотиваційної сфери спортсменів підлітково-юнацького віку. Теорія і практика сучасної психології : збірник наукових праць. 2020. № 1 (2). С. 8–12.
3. Злобіна О. Особистісна складова суспільних змін: соціологічний контекст. Соціологія: теорія, методи, маркетинг. 2003. № 3. С. 32–45.
4. Костюченко О. Художня перцепція в системі рекреації. Актуальні проблеми психології. 2015. № 12 (21). С. 174–183. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/appsuh_2015_12_21_19 (дата звернення: 30.01.2025).
5. Костюченко О. Творчий та адаптивний потенціал метафоризації у проектному менеджменті в соціокультурній сфері. Актуальні проблеми психології : збірник наукових праць Інституту психології імені Г.С. Костюка Національної академії педагогічних наук України. Київ : Фенікс, 2019. ХІІ (26) : Психологія творчості. С. 139–148.
6. Холл Н. Тест на визначення рівня емоційного інтелекту. URL: https://hrliga.com/index.php?id=5034&module=news&op=view (дата звернення: 30.01.2025).
7. Caldwell L.L., Witt P.A. Leisure, recreation, and play from a developmental context. New directions for youth development. 2011. № 2011 (130). P.13–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.394.
8. Freire T. Leisure experience and positive identity development in adolescents. Positive Leisure Science: From Subjective Experience to Social Contexts / T. Freire (Eds.) Dordrecht : Springer, 2013. P. 61–79. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5058-6_4.
9. Freire T., Teixeira A. The influence of leisure attitudes and leisure satisfaction on adolescents’ positive functioning: The role of emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018. № 9. Article 1349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01349.
10. Freire T., Tavares D., Silva E., Teixeira A. Flow, leisure, and positive youth development. Flow experience: Empirical research and applications / L. Harmat, F.Ø. Andersen, F. Ullén, J. Wright, G. Sadlo (Eds.). Springer International Publishing / Springer Nature, 2016. P. 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_11.
11. Hartmann H. Ego-psychology and the problem of adaptation. New York : International Universities Press, 2002. URL: https://archive.org/details/egopsychologypr00hart/page/n5/mode/2up (дата звернення: 30.01.2025).
12. Hofer J., Busch H., Kärtner J. Self-regulation and Well-being: The Influence of Identity and Motives. European Journal of Personality. 2011. № 25. Р. 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.789.
13. Kim S., Sung J., Park J., Dittmore S.W. The relationship among leisure attitude, satisfaction, and psychological wellbeing for college students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2015. № 15 (1). Р. 70–76. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2015.01012.
14. Kononchuk A., Svatenkov O., Svatenkova T., Kononchuk D., Waltz M. Youth health management sphere. Wiadomosci lekarskie. Warsaw, Poland, 1960. LXXIV (1). Wydawnictwo Aluna Z.M. Przesmyckiego, 29, 05–510, Konstancin-Jeziorna, Poland, 2021. Р. 2743–2749. URL: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57430348100 (дата звернення: 30.01.2025).
15. Lee Y.H., Ryff C.D., Essex M.J., Schmutte P.S. My children and me: Midlife evaluations of grown children and of self. Psychology and Aging. 1994. № 9 (2). Р.195–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.195.
16. Ragheb M.G., Beard J.G. Measuring leisure attitude. Journal of Leisure Research. 1982. № 14 (2). Р. 155–167. DOI: 10.1080/00222216.1982.11969512.
17. Rochelle M., Young J., Harvey J., Charity M., Payne W. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity. 2013. № 10. Р. 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-98.
18. Shin K., You S. Leisure type, leisure satisfaction and adolescents’ psychological wellbeing. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. 2013. № 7 (2). Р. 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2013.6.
19. Svatenkova T., Svatenkov O. Emotional potential in the children’s team. Wiadomości Lekarskie. № 74 (11 p. I). Konstancin-Jeziorna, Poland : Wydawnictwo Aluna Z.M. Przesmyckiego, 2021. Р. 2738–2742. URL: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57430348100 (дата звернення: 30.01.2025).
20. Timonen J., Niemelä M., Hakko H., Alakokkare A., Räsänen S. Associations between adolescents’ social leisure activities and the onset of mental disorders in young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2021. № 50 (9). Р. 1757–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01462-8.
21. Trainor S., Delfabbro P., Anderson S., Winefield A. Leisure activities and adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of adolescence. 2010. № 33 (1). Р.173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.03.013.
22. Wang E., Chen L., Lin J., Wang M.C. The relationship between leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction of adolescents concerning online games. Adolescence. 2008. № 43. Р. 177–184. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5405551_The_relationship_between_leisure_satisfaction_and_life_satisfaction_of_adolescents_concerning_online_games (дата звернення: 30.01.2025).
