THE PHILOSOPHY OF WELL-BEING IN THE CONTEXT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Abstract
The purpose of the work is the analysis of philosophical approaches in the context of understanding well-being. Methods: literature analysis, empirical, descriptive, generalization, analysis and synthesis, induc-tion and deduction. Results. The results are based on the study of a number of theories: desire satisfaction, objective list, subjective well-being, pleasure, utilitarianism, virtualism, significant achievements, important knowledge, beauty and well-being, autonomy. All this is considered through the prism of modern global chal-lenges and opportunities, highlighting key aspects such as the role of social justice, the importance of auton-omy and self-realization, the impact of technology on psychological well-being, as well as ways to minimize the negative effects of new processes. The theories considered can help society overcome psychological crisis states and find a balance between real threats and a sense of well-being. Theories of well-being can provide valuable advice on the challenges and needs of society during war, as well as ways to solve or mitigate them. Objective list theory emphasizes the importance of specific conditions and goods necessary for well-being. In times of war, the search for meaning, purpose, and fulfillment can seem particularly challenging. However, a eudaimonic approach can play a role in overcoming trauma and finding strength in the face of adversity. Volunteering, helping others, defending one’s country, and working together for a common goal can help indi-viduals find deeper meaning in their actions during a crisis. Conclusions. Contemporary theories of well-being offer a variety of perspectives on what makes life worthwhile and meaningful. The choice between them often depends on personal values, cultural and philosophical views. The theories reviewed highlight different aspects of well-being that can be used to guide conflict resolution, humanitarian aid development, and the reconstruc-tion of post-conflict societies. They help understand how to support individual and collective well-being in challenging environments, as well as how to promote recovery and healing after conflict ends. Despite their differences, all these theories seek to understand how to achieve a higher quality of life and fulfill the human desire for well-being.
References
2. Well-Being. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/#MooCha (дата звернення: 28.01.2025).
3. Аршава І. Суб’єктивне благополуччя та його індивідуально-психологічні та особистісні кореляти. Вісник Дніпропетровського університету. Серія «Педагогіка і психологія». 2012. Вип. 18. Т. 20. № 9/1.
4. Вартанова О., Маляренко І. Well-being як невід’ємна складова формування корпоративної стратегії підприємства. Міжнародна науково-практична конференція. 2020. Т. 1. С. 164–169.
5. Гордєєва Т. Оптимістичне мислення особистості як складова особистісного потенціалу. Психологічна діагностика. 2017. № 1. 234 c.
6. Олефір В. Психологія саморегуляції суб’єкта діяльності : дис. … докт. психол. наук : 19.00.01. Одеса, 2016. 428 с.
7. Пахоль Б. Суб’єктивне та психологічне благополуччя: сучасні і класичні підходи, моделі та чинники. Український психологічний журнал. 2017. № 1 (3). С. 80–96.
8. Топ-5 технік боротьби зі стресом. URL: https://i.factor.ua/journals/ot/2019/november/issue-22/1/article-105683.html (дата звернення: 28.01.2025).
9. Фромм Е. Людина для себе / пер. Л. Чернишової. Мінськ : Колегіум, 2016. 324 c.
10. Хелд Б. Досить посміхатися, починайте хмуритися. Нью-Йорк : St. Martin’s Griffin, 2015. 144 c.