ADULT’S AND ADOLESCENT’S SELF-PRESENTATION STRATEGIES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS

Keywords: self-presentation, adult and adolescence, social networks, self-image, self-presentation strategies, self-expression

Abstract

The article is devoted to the actual problem of personality Self-presentation in social networks amongadults and adolescents.

Purpose of the article is an empirical study of self-presentation psychological features in social networksand highlighting the differences in the use of virtual self-presentation strategies between adults and adolescents.

Methods. To achieve this purpose theoretical methods were used: analysis, synthesis, classification,generalization and systematization; empirical methods: Scale for measuring tactics of Self-presentation TacticsScale (S. Lee, B. Quigley) and the author’s questionnaire Self-presentation in social networks; statisticalmethods: T-Student’s criterion and hierarchical cluster analysis.

Results. The study of self-presentation strategies in social networks involved two groups of subjects -adolescents (30 subjects aged 11–16 years) and adults (30 subjects aged 21–30 years) with different experiencesof using social networks.

There are three dominant motives that motivate respondents to use social networks: interest, friendsand the desire to show themselves. The leading motive for adolescents is communication with friends, and foradults the characteristic motive is interest and desire to show themselves. The differences between the strategiesof virtual Self-presentation in adults and adolescents are analyzed. There are statistically significant differencesin the following strategies: avoidance; attractive behavior; self-aggrandizement; self-humiliation and force.

Using hierarchical cluster analysis, groups of social networks users of adults and adolescents were singledout according to the parameter of using virtual Self-presentation tactics. Among adults, there are three usergroups: 1) ideals-users, who want to present themselves as leaders; 2) users, who partially want to livethe lives of others; 3) users, who want to assert themselves in the virtual world. There are also three groupsof adolescents who use social networks: 1) users, who want to be liked and get social approval; 2) users aimedat Self-affirmation and 3) users, who need support.

Conclusions. It was found that in the conditions of active informatization there are different motivesfor using social networks in adults and adolescents. Differences in the choice of self-presentation strategiesby adults and adolescents in social networks are identified and the types of users are selected according tothe choice of the dominant strategy of virtual self-presentation.

References

1. Белинская Е.П., Жичкина А.Е. Самопрезентация в виртуальной коммуникации и особенности идентичности подростков-пользователей Интернет. Образование и информационная культура. 2000. С. 431–460.
2. Горный Е. Виртуальная личность как жанр творчества. 2011. 210 с.
3. Гофман Е. Представления себя другим в повседневной жизни. 2000. 304 с.
4. Капустюк О.М. Самопрезентація як засіб створення позитивного іміджу особистості. 2007. Проблеми загальної та педагогічної психології. 2007. Т. 2. С. 95–102.
5. Кононенко А.О. Самопрезентація як важливий регулятор соціальної поведінки суб’єкта. Теорія і практика сучасної психології. 2012. Вип. 4. С. 45-49.
6. Кузнецова Ю.М., Чудова Н.В. Психология жителей интернета. 2008. 224 с.
7. Михайлова Е.В. Самопрезентация. Теории, исследования, тренинг. Речь. 2007. 224 с.
8. Погонцева Д.В. Формирование впечатления средством виртуального общения. Концепт. 2013. № 1. С. 135–141.
9. Сенченко Н.А. Виртуальная личность в социокультурном интернет-пространстве. Культура и цивилизация. 2016. № 1. С. 128–140.
10. Сорокин О. Виртуальная личность. Высшая школа современных социальных наук. 2015. 30 с.
11. Шленкер Б. Межличностные процессы, включающие регуляцию и контроль впечатления. Реферативный журнал. 1994. № 12. С. 20–23.
12. Schutz A. Assertive, offensive, protective, and defensive styles of self-presentation: taxonomy. Journ. of Psychology. 1998. № 6. Р. 611–628.
13. Dsilva M. U., Maddocs R., Collins B. Criticism on the Internet: An analysis of participant reactions. Communication Research Reports. 5. 2009. 180– 187. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362112 (дата звернення: 20.02.2021).
14. Duffy B., Pruchniewska U., Scolere L. Platform-specific self-branding: Imagined affordances of the social media ecology. 8th International International Conference on Social Media and Society. July 2017. 5, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097291 (дата звернення: 20.02.2021).
15. Huang W. Analysis on Self-presentation in Internet Social Media. 3rd international social sciences and education conference. 2018. 19–22.
16. Petit J., Carcioppolo N. Associations between the Dark Triad and online communication behavior: A brief report of preliminary findings. Communication Research Reports. 5, V. 37. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1862784 (дата звернення: 20.02.2021).
Published
2021-06-08
Pages
14-21
Section
SECTION 1 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY