PERSONALITY’S SUPPORT BY ELECTRONIC MEANS: SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT
Abstract
Purpose. The paper is dedicated to the theoretical review of the researches on the electronic assistance of persons suffering from difficult life circumstances. Due to the lack of systematic studies of the socio-psychological aspects of such support, the purpose was to identify socio-psychological predictors which enhance the personality’s psychological well-being as a result of their participation in online peer-support groups.
Methods. The study used theoretical methods of information collecting, analyzing, and generalizing. The systematic analysis of the sources was carried out in three stages: the first stage was the selection of the newest researches on the identified issues by Google Scholar subscription; the second stage included manual search and selection of sources in the Web of Science Core Collection based on thematic queries in various refinements; at the third stage, among all selected sources, there were analyzed those that contained in the text any socio-psychological indicators of increase in the respondents’ psychological well-being.
Results. A systematic review of the literature showed that the effectiveness of electronic means in socio-psychological support of the person is conditioned, first of all, by the social support need’s satisfaction. It is found that its components – informational (exchange of practical advice and knowledge), emotional (expressive response and utilization of affect), esteem (reinterpretation of painful experience and motivation to act), network (widening of the circle of contacts), and tangible (acting help and material means’ exchange) support – can be successfully implemented in an online environment. Other socio-psychological predictors of the individual’s psychological well-being enhancing by means of electronic support are defined as the mechanism of social identification with the online group and a sense of belonging to it; a sense of community through similar experiences; conventionality and respect for personal boundaries; lurking as an online-specific phenomenon of user interaction with a group without self-expression seen by others. It is shown that the described predictors can have a positive effect on the psychological well-being of supported ones if their personal characteristics are taken into account.
Conclusions. The described socio-psychological predictors of the online support impact on enhancing the psychological well-being of its participants will form the basis of an empirical model for the study of electronic socio-psychological support for victims of military actions in the East of Ukraine.
References
2. Bambina, A. (2007). Online social support: the interplay of social networks and computer-mediated communication. Cambria press.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: TheExerciseofControl. NewYork: WorthPublishers.
4. Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., &Suler, J. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in human behavior, 24(5), 1867–1883.
5. Coulson, N. S., Bullock, E., & Rodham, K. (2017). Exploring the therapeutic affordances of self-harm online support communities: An online survey of members. JMIR mental health, 4(4), e44.
6. Cummings, J. N., Sproull, L., &Kiesler, S. B. (2002). Beyond hearing: Where the real-world and online support meet. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 78.
7. Feldman, M. D. (2000) MunchausenbyInternet: detectingfactitiousillnessandcrisisontheInternet.Southern Medical Journal , 93, 669–672.
8. Festinger, L. (1954). A TheoryofSocialComparisonProcesses. Human Relations,7(2), 117–140.
9. Han, J. Y., Kim, E., Lee, Y. I., Shah, D. V., & Gustafson, D. H. (2019). A Longitudinal Investigation of Empathic Exchanges in Online Cancer Support Groups: Message Reception and Expression Effects on Patients’ Psychosocial Health Outcomes. Journal of health communication, 1–9.
10. Idriss, S. Z., Kvedar, J. C., & Watson, A. J. (2009). The role of online support communities: benefits of expanded social networks to patients with psoriasis. Archives of dermatology, 145(1), 46–51.
11. Iliffe, L. L., & Thompson, A. R. (2019). Investigating the beneficial experiences of online peer support for those affected by alopecia: An interpretative phenomenological analysis using online interviews. British Journal of Dermatology. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bjd.17998
12. Kolawole, O. (2019). Psychological impact of online support communities: can human participation in an online health community improve psychological well-being. Retrieved from: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/65018
13. Lieberman, M. A., & Goldstein, B. A. (2006). Not all negative emotions are equal: The role of emotional expression in online support groups for women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer, 15(2), 160–168.
14. Mazuro,C., &Rao,N. (2011). Onlinediscussionforumsinhighereducation: Islurkingworking? International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 2(2), 364–371.
15. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 116–127.
16. Mo, P. K., & Coulson, N. S. (2014). Are online support groups always beneficial? A qualitative exploration of the empowering and disempowering processes of participation within HIV/AIDS-related online support groups. International journal of nursing studies, 51(7), 983–993.
17. Pretorius, C. (2016). The experience of active involvement in an online Facebook support group, as a form of support for individuals who are diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. TydskrifvirGeesteswetenskappe, 56(3), 809–828.
18. Riessman, F. (1965). The “Helper” TherapyPrinciple.SocialWork, 10, 27–32.
19. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing.Jou rnalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology, 57, 1069–1081
20. Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., &Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The health-related functions ofsocial support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 381–406.
21. Smith-Merry, J., Goggin, G., Campbell, A., McKenzie, K., Ridout, B., &Baylosis, C. (2019). Social Connection and Online Engagement: Insights From Interviews With Users of a Mental Health Online Forum. JMIR mental health, 6(3), e11084.
22. Strøm, J., Høybye, M. T., Laursen, M., Jørgensen, L. B., & Nielsen, C. V. (2019). Lumbar Spine Fusion Patients’ Use of an Internet Support Group: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(7), e9805.
23. Tytarenko, T. M. (2018) Sposobypidvyshchennyapsykholohichnohoblahopoluchchyaosobystosti, shchoperezhylatravmu [Ways to increase the psychological well-being of personality who has overcome trauma]. Psykholohiya: teoriyaipraktyka, 1(1), 112–119 [in Ukrainian].
24. Tytarenko, T. M. (2019). Sotsialno-psykholohichnyi suprovidyaksposibpolehshennyaperekhoduvidviynydomyru [Socio-psychologicalsupportas a waytofacilitate war-to-peace transition]. Retrievedfrom: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/713417/[inUkrainian].
25. White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health education research, 16(6), 693–707.
26. Winzelberg, A. (1997) Theanalysisofanelectronicsupportgroupforindividualswitheatingdisorders. Computersin Human Behavior, 13, 393–407.
27. Yalom, I.D.; Leszcz, M. (2008).TheoryandPracticeofGroupPsychotherapy. London: Hachette.
28. Yoo, W., Namkoong, K., Choi, M., Shah, D. V., Tsang, S., Hong, Y., ...& Gustafson, D. H. (2014). Giving and receiving emotional support online: Communication competence as a moderator of psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Computers in human behavior, 30, 13–22.
29. Zhu, Y., & Stephens, K. K. (2019). Online Support Group Participation and Social Support: Incorporating Identification and Interpersonal Bonds. Small Group Research, 50(5), 593–622.
