СОЦІАЛЬНО-ПІДТРИМУЮЧА МЕРЕЖА ЯК КОПІНГ-РЕСУРС ПРОФЕСІЙНОЇ САМОРЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ЖІНОК
Ключові слова:
соціально-підтримуюча мережа, професійна самореалізація, копінг-ресурс, підтримуюча комунікація, рольовий конфлікт
Анотація
У статті висвітлено поняття соціально-підтримуючої мережі як важливого копінг-ресурсу професійної самореалізації жінок. Проаналізовано дослідження науковців, що стосувались необхідності наявності ефективної соціально-підтримуючої мережі в процесі становлення жінки як професіонала, матері та дружини. Наголошується на тому, що наявність ефективної мережі здійснює позитивний вплив на психологічне здоров’я жінки.
Посилання
1. Рыбников В.Ю. Психология копинг-поведения специалистов опасных профессий / В.Ю. Рыбников, Е.Н. Ашанина. – М. : Политехника-сервис, 2012. − 120 с.
2. Schaefer C., Coyne J.C., Lazarus R.S. The health-rated functions of social support. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 4. – 1981. – Р. 381–406.
3. Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress / S. Cobb. – Psychosomatic Medicine, 38. – 1976. – Р. 300–314.
4. Gildea T. Combat vet says gender bias to untreated PTSD / Т. Gildea. – March 30, 2010. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу : from http://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId= 124500733/.
5. MacGeorge E.L, Clark R.A. Gillian S.I. Sex differences in the provision of skillful emotional support: The mediating role of self-efficasy. – Communication Reports, 15. – 2002. – Р. 17–28.
6. S. Jones Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helped competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. – Communication Research, 31. – 2004. – Р. 338–360.
7. Goffman E. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gathering / Е. Goffman. – New York : Free Press, 1963.
8. Stohl C. Organizational communication: connectedness in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. – 1995.
9. Sevim, S.A., 2006. Religious tendency and gender roles: Predictors of the attitudes toward women’s work roles. Soc. Behav. Personal. Intl. J., 34: 77–86.
10. Abdullah, R., S. Jahan and S. Saha Occupational stress, social and family difficulties and job contentment of working women: Bangladesh perspective. Daffodil International University, Bangladesh. – 2008.
11. AL-Hussami, R.N.M., 2008. A study of nurses’ job satisfaction: The relationship to organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, transactional leadership, transformational leadership and level of education. Eu. J. Sci. Res. 22: 286–295.
12. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.
13. Mount M.K., & Barrick, M.R. The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 1995. – Р. 153–200.
14. Berkowitz, A., & Perkins, H. W. Stress among farm women: Work and family as nteracting system s.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 1984. – Р. 161–165.
15. Maryam Zarra-Nezhad, Ali Moazami-Goodarzi, Leila Hasannejad and Khadijeh Roushani Occupational Stress and Family Difficulties of Working Women. – Current Research in Psychology 1 (2), 2010. – Р. 75–81.
16. Hobfoll, S.E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50 (3), 2001. – Р. 337–421.
17. Ten Brummelhuis, L.L., & Bakker, A.B. A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67 (7), 2012. – Р. 545.
18. Miller J.E. Effective support group. Fort wayne, IN: Willowgreen. – 1998.
19. Schutz W. FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. – New York : Rinehart, 1958.
2. Schaefer C., Coyne J.C., Lazarus R.S. The health-rated functions of social support. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 4. – 1981. – Р. 381–406.
3. Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress / S. Cobb. – Psychosomatic Medicine, 38. – 1976. – Р. 300–314.
4. Gildea T. Combat vet says gender bias to untreated PTSD / Т. Gildea. – March 30, 2010. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу : from http://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId= 124500733/.
5. MacGeorge E.L, Clark R.A. Gillian S.I. Sex differences in the provision of skillful emotional support: The mediating role of self-efficasy. – Communication Reports, 15. – 2002. – Р. 17–28.
6. S. Jones Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helped competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. – Communication Research, 31. – 2004. – Р. 338–360.
7. Goffman E. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gathering / Е. Goffman. – New York : Free Press, 1963.
8. Stohl C. Organizational communication: connectedness in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. – 1995.
9. Sevim, S.A., 2006. Religious tendency and gender roles: Predictors of the attitudes toward women’s work roles. Soc. Behav. Personal. Intl. J., 34: 77–86.
10. Abdullah, R., S. Jahan and S. Saha Occupational stress, social and family difficulties and job contentment of working women: Bangladesh perspective. Daffodil International University, Bangladesh. – 2008.
11. AL-Hussami, R.N.M., 2008. A study of nurses’ job satisfaction: The relationship to organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, transactional leadership, transformational leadership and level of education. Eu. J. Sci. Res. 22: 286–295.
12. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.
13. Mount M.K., & Barrick, M.R. The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 1995. – Р. 153–200.
14. Berkowitz, A., & Perkins, H. W. Stress among farm women: Work and family as nteracting system s.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 1984. – Р. 161–165.
15. Maryam Zarra-Nezhad, Ali Moazami-Goodarzi, Leila Hasannejad and Khadijeh Roushani Occupational Stress and Family Difficulties of Working Women. – Current Research in Psychology 1 (2), 2010. – Р. 75–81.
16. Hobfoll, S.E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50 (3), 2001. – Р. 337–421.
17. Ten Brummelhuis, L.L., & Bakker, A.B. A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67 (7), 2012. – Р. 545.
18. Miller J.E. Effective support group. Fort wayne, IN: Willowgreen. – 1998.
19. Schutz W. FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. – New York : Rinehart, 1958.
Опубліковано
2019-10-07
Сторінки
115-119
Розділ
СЕКЦІЯ 1 ЗАГАЛЬНА ПСИХОЛОГІЯ; ПСИХОЛОГІЯ ОСОБИСТОСТІ
