KYIV PHILOSOPH. & PSYCHOL. SCHOOL OF THE XIXth TO THE BEGINNING OF THE XXth CENTURY: FEATURES, TRENDS, PRINCIPAL IDEAS & PRINCIPLES OF KNOWL. OF HUMAN (AT THE EXAM. OF REPRESENT. OF THE KYIV THEO- LOGICAL ACAD. & THE KYIV UNIVER. IN THE NAME OF SV. VOLOD)
Abstract
Actuality of the proposed material is determined by the important task of historical and psychological knowledge - the disclosure of the creative potential of the past to solve the theoretical and methodological problems of modern psychology. The article presents data from the conducted historiographic search. For the first time, the scientific community is offered certain key results of the historical and psychological analysis of the theoretical and methodological foundations in the scientific heritage of representatives and prominent students of the kiev school of philosophy and the nineteenth and early centuries the XIXth. to the begining of the XX th. century on the example of the Kiev Theological Academy and Kiev University of St. Vladimir. Bib- liographic data, understanding and ways for scientists to solve the problem of human knowledge are presented (pres. Innokenty, P.S. Avsenev, D.V. Pospehov O.M. Novitsky, I.M. Skvortsov, V.N. Karpov, P.D. Yurkevich, M.M. Troitsky, S.S. Gogotsky, A.N. Gilyarov, G.I. Chelpanov, I.A. Sikorsky and V.V. Zenkovsky). The main tendencies of scientists, principles of knowledge of a person and a circle of interests are revealed. Particular emphasis is placed on the importance of achieving harmony of the malefactor, both with the external world and with oneself, to strive to realize their abilities through self-knowledge and objective data. We conducted an analysis of the scientific views of the representatives of Kyiv Philosophical and Psychological School of the XIX-th grade. Twentieth century has allowed to highlight certain leading tendencies, in particular, the prevalence of the humanistic approach in explaining the psychological features of a person, creation of personality, as well as knowledge of its psychological peculiarities within the framework of the established principles, such as anthropological, substantive, cardiocentric, self-development and ethics. The psychophysical problem that took place in the domestic psychological thought of one century was solved in favor of unity, eliminating forever its dualistic vision.
References
2. Гиляров А.Н. Философия в ее существе, значении и истории. Т. 1. Изд. 2-е. Киев: Тип. Имп.Ун-та Св. Владимира, 1916. XXIV, [2]. 644 [1] c. (Руководство к изучению философии).
3. Гогоцкий С.С. Введение в педагогику. Вып. 2-ой. Киев: В Универ. Тип., 1882. 84 с.
4. Зеньковский В.В. Проблема психической причинности. Киев: В Тип. Ипмр. Универ. Св. Владимира, 1914. 435 с.
5. Карпов В.Н. Вступительная лекция в психологию. Христианское чтение. Ч. 1. Санкт-Петербург, 1868. С. 188–229.
6. Новицкий О.М. Руководство к опытной психологии. Киев: В Универ. Тип., 1840. 488 с.
7. Поспехов Д.В. Нравственное назначение человека. ТКДА. Т. ІІ. Киев, 1891. С. 353–394.
8. Святитель Иннокентий. Сочинения. Единец: Издание М.О. Вольфа, Единецко-Бричанская епархия, 2005. 432 с.
9. Сикорский И.А. Всеобщая психология с физиогномикой в иллюстр. излож. 2-изд. доп. Киев, 1912. 330 с.
10. Скворцов И.М. Записки по нравственной философии. Киев, 1869. 83 с.
11. Троицкий М.М. Немецкая психология в текущем столетии: Историко-критическое исследование с предварительным очерком успехов психологии в Англии со времен Бэкона и Локка. Москва, 1867. 450 с.
12. Челпанов Г. Учебник психологии (для гимназий и самообразования) 12-ое изд. Москва: Изд. Т-ва В.В. Думнов, 1915. 224 с.
13. Юркевич П.Д. Философские произведения. Москва: Правда, 1990. 420 с.