GENDER-ROLE CONFLICT OF PERSONALITY IN CAREER DEVELOPMENT

  • О.М. Chuуko
Keywords: gender-role conflict, gender role, gender identity, career

Abstract

The paper contributes to recent efforts to explore peculiarities of male and female gender-role conflict manifestation. We study gender-role conflict from the perspective of socially constructed gender role norms. We analyze the following male gender role norms: success and status, career development, breadwinning and financial security, physical, mental and emotional toughness, antifemininity, aggressive behavior. We also study the concept of hegemonic masculinity as male role norm. The research findings suggest that failure to conform to conventional male norms results in a gender-role conflict accompanied by stress disorder, negative health effects, and work addiction.
For the purpose of this research, we classify female gender-role conflicts in career pursuit into 3 groups: gender inequality on the labor market which has adverse effect on career achievement; gender identity con- flict; family-to-work conflict which is of particular relevance to women rather than men, with special focus on family-to-work conflict in women.
Our research reveals an adverse impact of gender-role conflict on male and female career achievements. Challenges are associated with difficulties in adhering to conventional gender roles in career; with neglect of individual psychological peculiarities in career orientation, which are far from being consistent with socially constructed gender expectations and stereotypes; with instances of work addiction; with the necessity for taking on a large number of gender roles in career and family; with remorse for being unable to pay attention to family or career. We find that individuals inclined to abide by conventional gender norms encounter difficulties most often (this is especially true of men). Gender conflict is most often due to the relevance of traditional gender norms. In modern conditions such standards require revision, flexibility, and orientation towards egalitarianism.

References

1. Борейчук Т. Гегемонія чоловіків: від теорії до практики. Ґендерний журнал «Я». Ґендер і чоловіки. 3. 2015(39). С. 2–5. URL: http://krona.org.ua/assets/files/journal/Gendernyi-zhurnal-Ya-39-2015.pdf.
2. Клецина И.С., Иоффе Е.В. Гендерные нормы как социально-психологический феномен. Монография. М.: Изд-во «Проспект», 2017. 171с.
3. Пампуха Л.О. Чинники внутрішньоособистісних рольових конфліктів у жінок керівників. URL: http://appsychology.org.ua/data/jrn/v7/i4/37.pdf.
4. Ткалич М.Г. Ґендерна психологія: навч. посіб. 2-ге вид., випр., доповн. К.: Академвидав, 2016. 256 с.
5. Ткалич М.Г. Ґендерно-орієнтований підхід у психологічному супроводі персоналу організацій. Вісник Харківського національного педагогічного університету імені Г.С. Сковороди. Психологія. 2015. Вип. 51. С. 247-255. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhnpu_psykhol_2015_51_26.
6. Федоришин Г.М. Психологічні проблеми сімейного виховання: навчальний посібник. Івано-Франківськ: Місто НВ, 2013. 224 с.
7. Ben-Galim, Tompson S. Who`s breadwinning? Working mothers and the new face of family support. Report. Institute Public Policy Research. London: IPPR, 2012.
8. Betz N. E. Women's career development / Eds. Denmark F., Paludi Michele A. Psychology of Women: Handbook of Issues and Theories. Conn.: Westport, Praeger. pp. 717–753.
9. Burke Ronald J. Men, Masculinity, and Health / Eds. Nelson Debra L., Burke Ronald J. Gender, Work Stress, and Health. American Psychological Association. DC: Washington, 2018. pp 35–54. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6683.
10. Heikkinen, S., La¨msa¨, A.-M., Hiillos, M. Narratives by women managers about spousal support for their careers. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2014. № 30. рр. 27–39.
11. Meeussen L, Veldman J and Van Laar C. Combining Gender, Work, and Family Identities: The Cross-Over and Spill-Over of Gender Norms into Young Adults’ Work and Family Aspirations. Front. Psychol. 2016. 7:1781. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01781.
12. Nelson Debra L., Burke Ronald J. Framework for Examining Gender, Work Stress, and Health. In Nelson Debra L., Burke Ronald J. (Eds.) Gender, Work Stress, and Health. American Psychological Association. DC : Washington, 2016. pp. 3–15. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6683.
13. Patton, Wendy & McMahon, Mary. Career Development and Systems Theory. Connecting Theory and Practice. 3-rd Edition. Sense publishers. 476 p.
14. Scott J., Clery E. Gender roles. An incomplete revolution? In Park A., Bryson C., Clery E., Curtice J. and Phillips M. (eds.) (2013). British Social Attitudes: the 30th Report, London: NatCen Social Research. P. 115-139. URL: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/38457/bsa30_gender_roles_final.pdf.
15. Steinberg J.R., True M., Russo N.F. Work and family roles : selected issues. In Denmark F., Paludi Michele A. (Ed.) (2008). Psychology of Women: Handbook of Issues and Theories. Westport, Conn. : Praeger. Pp. 652-700.
Published
2018-12-27
Pages
226-231
Section
SECTION 3 SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF SOCIAL WORK