FEATURES OF THE CONNECTION OF PROFESSIONAL I-CONCEPT OF TEACHER AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING

  • S.I. Bilozerska
  • S.O. Mashchak
Keywords: self-concept, self-determination, psychological well-being, hardiness, self-organization activities, teacher

Abstract

The article is analyzed a Self-concept as a collection of beliefs about oneself. It is used a set of methods to determine the level of psychological well-being, features of self-determination, hardiness and self-organization activities. It is revealed that teachers with high levels of psychological well-being have higher level of self-determination and autonomy, as its component, compared to teachers with low levels of psychological well-being. It is investigated the link between psychological well-being and personal hardiness. It is revealed that the self-determination of the person to a certain extent linked with the peculiarities of self-organizing activity of teachers. Professional pedagogical activity of teacher is called to provide the decision of tasks of studies, education and development of pupil’s .The professional activity of teacher belongs to the type “manman” and envisages the difficult co-operating with other people (by students, parents, pedagogical collective, own family). Exactly, healthy professional a Self-concept gives an opportunity to the teacher to realize re- quirements and specific of pedagogical activity and also assists effective self-regulation, self-development and self-realization in a pedagogical profession. A teacher with positive a Self-concep reposes in itself, content with the profession, him pedagogical activity effective, he wants self-realization, and in pedagogical activity the absent phenomenon of the “professional burning” down. The Self-concep of teacher has direct connec- tion from a Self-concep of pupil’s: if a Self-concept of the teacher is positive, then the pupil’s in a benevolent school atmosphere can mutually development and self-development.

References

1. Водяха С.А. Психологическое благополучие учащихся. Психологическое благополучие личности в современном образовательном пространстве: сб. статей / Составитель: Ю.В. Братчикова. Екатеринбург: Урал. гос. Пед. ун-т., 2013. 146 с.
2. Возможности эмпирического исследования личностного потенциала. Леонтьев Д.А., Мандрикова, Е.Ю., Осин Е., Плотникова А.В. Рассказова Е.И. Прикладная психология как ресурс социально-экономического развития современной России. Материалы межрегиональной научно-практической конференции. Москва, 2005. С. 259–260.
3. Гордеева Т.О. Психология мотивации достижения. Москва: Смысл; Академия, 2006. 336 с.
4. Гордеева Т.О. Теория самодетерминации: настоящее и будущее. Часть 2: Вопросы практического применения теории. Психологические исследования: электрон. науч. журн. 2010 № 5(13).
5. Леонтьев Д.А., Рассказова Е.И. Тест жизнестойкости. Москва: Смысл, 2006.
6. Лепешинский Н.Н. Адаптация опросника «Шкалы психологического благополучия» К. Рифф. Психологический журнал, 2007. №3. С. 43.
7. Личностный потенциал: структура и диагностика / под ред. Д.А. Леонтьева. Москва: Смысл, 2011. 679 с.
8. Мандрикова. Е.Ю. Разработка опросника самоорганизации деятельности (ОСД). Психологическая диагностика. 2010. № 2. С. 87–111
9. Шарай В.Б. Функциональное состояние педагогов в зависимости от форм организации студенческого процесса. Москва: Педагогика, 2003. 483 с.
10. Шевеленкова Т.Д., Фесенко П.П. Психологическое благополучие личности (обзор основных концепций и методика исследования). Психол. диагностика.
2005. № 3. С. 95–129.
11. Diner E. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin. 1999. P. 276–301
12. Maddi S. The search for meaning / Eds. W.J. Arnold, M.M. Page. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1971. P. 137–186.
13. Ryan R. M. and Deci E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American psychologist, 2000, vol. 55, N 1, P. 68–78.
14. Ryff C. D. Psychological Well-Being. Encyclopedia of Gerontology. 1996. Vol. 2. P. 365–369.
Published
2018-12-27
Pages
71-77
Section
SECTION 2 PEDAGOGICAL AND AGE PSYCHOLOGY