MASCULINITY AS A FACTOR OF PERSONALITY WELL-BEING: CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY

  • Sandra Velasques-Montiel
Keywords: gender identity, masculinity, sexual role, psychological well-being, autonomy, positive relationship with others, management of the social environment, personal growth, self-perception, goals in life

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the connection and the influence of masculinity on the psychological well-being of the personality in different ethnic composition of the samples.

Methods. To achieve the purpose, the features of masculinity and psychological well-being in the three groups of subjects – Ukrainians, Germans and Spaniards – empirical study was conducted. To determine the severity of masculinity in the Ukrainian sample, the FPI questionnaire (J. Farenberg, H. Zelg, R. Gampel, the “masculinity / femininity” scale) was used, the factor “masculinity–femininity” in the studied Spanish and German samples was diagnosed with the help of the questionnaire MMPI-2 (J. Graham, A. Telligen, J. Bucher, V. Dalstrom, B. Kemmer, scale 5 “masculinity / femininity” was used). The specificity of psychological well-being of all groups was investigated using the questionnaire “Scale of psychological well-being” (K.D. Riff, adaptation of T.Shevelenkova and P. Fesenko). Further empirical data quantitative analysis provided for the application of the Pearson correlation coefficient and Spearman rank correlation coefficient, regression analysis.

Results. Clear correlations of masculine gender identity with such parameters of psychological well-being as the ability to autonomy, management of social environment and personal growth are revealed. Differences in this correlations, which are various investigated groups, identified by ethnicity, representatives characteristic, was established. Spaniards are distinguished by the fact that their gender role is related to the expression of masculinity, involves the existence of clear living goals, positive perceptions of oneself and the realization of relationships. The Germans who have masculine patterns of behavior also have a positive attitude to themselves, but the realization of their relationships and life goals for them is not determinative of well-being. The masculine behavior of Ukrainian men assumes autonomy in social relations and is not connected with any clear goals of life, with any positive perception of oneself.

Conclusion. According to the empirical research we find out that the acquisition of a clearly defined masculine gender identity is a significant factor in achieving psychological well-being. A clear definition of the prevailing gender pattern of behavior gives individuals the opportunity to more successfully implement themselves in the system of relationships with others and be realized in life.

References

1. Говорун Т., Кікінежді О. Стать та сексуальність: психологічний ракурс : [навчальний посібник]. Тернопіль : Богдан, 1999. 384 с.
2. Головнева И.В. Изменение традиционных внутрисемейных ролей: новые модели поведения и конфликты. Практична психологія та соціальна робота. 2006. № 4. С. 12–16.
3. Каргіна Н.В. Ресурси та чинники психологічного благополуччя особистості : дис. ... канд. психол. наук : 19.00.01. Одеса, 2018. 270 с.
4. Кашлюк Ю.І. Основні чинники, які впливають на психологічне благополуччя особистості. Проблеми сучасної психології. 2016. Вип. 34. С. 170–186.
5. Кочарян А.С. Личность и половая роль. Харків : Основа, 1996. 127 с.
6. Кочарян О.С., Жидко М.Є. Особистісні чинники формування відносин подружньої співзалежності у чоловіків. Наукові студії із соціальної та політичної психології. Київ : Міленіум, 2007. Вип. 17 (20). С. 104–110.
7. Максименко С.Д., Максименко К.С., Папуча М.В. Психологія особистості. Київ : Видавництво ТОВ «КММ», 2007. 296 с.
8. Позднякова Е.П. Понятие феномена «психологическое благополучие» в современной психологии личности. Психологический журнал. 2007. № 3. С. 87–102.
9. Шевеленкова Т.Д., Фесенко П.П. Психологическое благополучие личности (обзор основных концепций и методик исследования). Психологическая диагностика. 2005. № 3. С. 95–122.
10. Batz, C. & Tay L. (2017). Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being. e-Handbook of Subjective Well-Being. E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay, Editors. Publisher: NobaScholar, Р. 1–27.
11. Gómez-Baya D., Lucia-Casademunt A. M. & Salinas-Pérez J.A. (2018). Gender Differences in Psychological-Well-Being and Health Problems among European Health Professionals: Analysis of Psychological Basic Needs and Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, Р. 1-27.
12. Meisenberg G., Woodley M.A., (2014). Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being and Their Relationships with Gender Equality. Happiness Study. September, 20 р.
13. Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, Р. 719–727.
14. Zuckerman, M., Li, C., & Diener, E. F. (2017). Societal Conditions and the Gender Difference in Well-Being: Testing a Three-Stage Model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), Р. 329–336.
Published
2019-10-08
Pages
13-21
Section
SECTION 1 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY