THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES IN MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS

  • Abdullah Turkmen
Keywords: Social Networking Sites, Low self-esteem, Psychosocial Effect, Middle school students

Abstract

Social Networking Sites (SNS) such as Facebook, RenRen, YouTube and WeChat are some of the most popular Internet applications across the world. Social Networking Sites (SNS) provide a powerful means of sharing, organizing, and finding content and contacts. Because much of the content is publicly available, it is possible to collect data from these sites and analyze their characteristics and privacy-related issues. The study of social networking sites (SNS) within the field of psychology is fairly new. It was hypothesized that Individuals who possess low self-esteem will utilize Social Networking Sites (SNS) to compensate for that deficiency. Their interactions on their Social Networking Sites (SNS) of choice will be held in greater importance than an individual with a higher self-esteem rating. This relationship was expected to be greater among girls than boys. The participants in the study were given a survey that contains questions about the types of social media they use, how often they use it, how they feel they are viewed by their peers, etc. All of the participants in the study are between seventh and eighth grade and attend a summer camp in Samsun, Turkey. These results suggest that individuals with low self-esteem hold their Social Networking Sites (SNS) interaction higher than those with high self-esteem.

References

1. Barker V. (2009). Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: the influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior. № 12. Р. 209–213.
2. Collins L. (2008). Myspace, cyberbullying, and Megan Meier’s suicide: the New Yorker. URL: The New Yorker.com.
3. Ellison N.B., Steinfeld S., Lampe C. (2008). The benefits of facebook ”friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. №Р. 1143–1168.
4. Kraut R., Patterson M., Lundmark V., Kiesler S., Mukopadhyay T., Scherlis W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist. № 53(9). Р. 1017–1031.
5. Kraut R., Kiesler S., Boneva B., Cummings J., Helgeson V., Crawford A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues. № 58 (1). Р. 49–74.
6. Pempek T.A., Yermolayeva Y.A., Calvert S.L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. № 30. Р. 227–238.
7. Steinfield C., Ellison N.B., Lampe C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. № 29. Р. 434–445.
8. Valkenburg P.M., Peter J., Schouten A. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. № 9. Р. 584–590.
9. Türkmen A., Cabbarov R., Mustafayev M., Aliyev B. Studying Loneliness, Friendship, Self Esteem of Turkish Young Students Using Facebook in High Schools of The Azerbaijan Republic. 2nd Eurasian Congress on Positive Psychology, May 12–14. Üsküdar University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2017.
Pages
208-212
Section
SECTION 1 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY