PERSONAL ASPECTS OF HARDINESS AMONG PUPILS IN DIFFERENT EDUCATION ENVIRONMENTS

  • I.S. Kryvenko
  • S.M. Ivanovych
Keywords: hardiness, biologically determined personality traits, socially determined characteristics, pupils from boarding schools, gymnasium pupils, stress coping

Abstract

The article encloses the results of the study of hardiness level as a personal pre-disposition associated with 
constructive response in stressful situations, among pupils of boarding schools and general education schools and gymnasiums. Psychological hardiness is meant to be a system of beliefs about the self, the world and the relation- ships with the world, which includes three dimensions: commitment, control, and challenge. Due to S. Maddi’s concept, hardiness develops on the influence of environment, however, in many recent researches the connection
between hardiness and many biologically determined characteristics (such as temperament) are revealed.

The aim of the study was to investigate the connections of hardiness with personal biologically and socially determined personal traits while controlling the educational environment of the studied pupils. Namely, the two groups of teenagers took part in the research, 26 of them studying in the boarding school (as the result of their parents being unable to take care of them at home or being orphans) and 27 pupils of the gymnasium. Besides personal hardiness, such characteristics as Big Five traits and Cattell personality traits were measured.

It was found out that high school pupils from boarding schools have significantly lower indicators of hardiness, compared to their peers who study in the gymnasium. At the same time, it has been established that, regardless of the studying conditions, hardiness is higher among teenagers with a low level of neuroticism and adequate selfesteem. For the pupils of the boarding school it is important to work on hardiness strengthening, together with developing personality traits of pragmatism and realism for more effective coping with stress. Among pupils from the gymnasi- um hardiness is most closely connected with a trustful and confident position in relation to the world.

References

1. Дідик Н.М. Соціально-психологічна реабілітація дезадаптації дітей-сиріт. Суми : Вид-во Сумського ДПУ ім. А.С. Макаренка, 2016. 120 с.
2. Леонтьев Д.А., Рассказова Е.И. Тест жизнестойкости. Москва : Смысл, 2006. 63 с.
3. Михеева А.В. Стрессоустойчивость: к проблеме определения. Вопросы образования. 2010. № 2. С. 82–110.
4. Стельмащук Х.Р. Психологічний механізм стресостійкості підлітків-сиріт. Педагогіка і психологія професійної освіти. 2014. № 4. С. 189–198.
5. Стельмащук Х.Р. Психологічні аспекти формування довірливих стосунків у дітей-сиріт як одна з умов стресостійкості. Проблеми сучасної психології. 2015. № 28. С. 539–550.
6. Цуркан Т.Г. Взаємини дитини і батьків як визначальний фактор впливу на формування особистості. Наука і освіта. 2015. № 3. С. 120–125.
7. Черпіта М.М., Гурич А.Ю., Джеджула О.М. Стресостійкість. Наукові записки Вінницького національного аграрного університету. Серія «Соціально-гуманітарні науки». 2013. Вип. 2. С. 202–208.
8. Bar-On R. How important is it to educate people to be emotionally and socially intelligent, and can it be done? Perspectives in Education. 2003. № 21. P. 3–13.
9. Bissonnette M. Optimism, Hardiness, and Resiliency: A Review of the Literature Prepared forChild and Family Partnership Project. URL: https://corstone.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Optimism-Hardiness-and-Resiliency-review.pdf (дата звернення: 13.12.2018).
10. Hills H., Norvell N. An examination of hardiness and neuroticism as potential moderators of stress outcomes. Behavioural Medicine. 1991. Vol. 17(1). P. 31–38.
11. Kobasa S.C., Sanders G.S., Suls J.E. The Hardy Personality: Toward a Social Psychology of Stress and Health. Social Psychology of Health and Illness. 1982. P. 1–25.
12. Koshaba D.M., Maddi S.R. Early Experiences in Hardiness Development. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 1999. Vol. 51(2). P. 106–116.
13. Maddi S.R. Comments on Trends in Hardiness Research and Theorizing. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 1999. Vol. 51(2). Р. 67–71.
14. Maddi S.R. Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2006. № 1. Р. 160–168.
15. Maddi S.R., Kahn S., Maddi K.L. The Effectiveness of Hardiness Training. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 1998. Vol. 50(2). Р. 78–86.
16. Parkes K.R., Rendall D. The hardy personality and its relationship to extraversion and neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences. 1988. Vol. 9. Issue 4. P. 785–790.
17. Power R.A., Pluess M. Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants. Translational Psychiatry. 2015. № 5. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068715/ (дата звернення: 13.12.2018).
18. Subramanian S., Vinothkumar M. Hardiness Personality, Self-Esteem and Occupational Stress among IT Professionals. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 2009. Vol. 35. P. 48–56.
Published
2019-03-25
Pages
148-153
Section
SECTION 2 PEDAGOGICAL AND AGE PSYCHOLOGY