SELF-REGULATION OF EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF CADETS: TYPOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MANIFESTATION

Keywords: academic self-regulation, educational motivation, cadets, psychological capital of the student, psycho-emotional states in classes, pressings of educational and professional activity.

Abstract

The purpose is to determine the typological features of academic self-regulation of cadets and their role in the manifestation of the student’s psychological capital, psycho-emotional states, subjective perception of stressors of educational activity. Methods. Theoretical (analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, generalization, systematization of scientific literature on studying the peculiarities of self-regulation of students and cadets); empirical: the method “Psychological capital of the student” (Luthans, Youssef & Avoli, 2007), the method of express evaluation of positive and negative emotionality “Scale of positive affect and negative affect” (SPANA) (is a modification of the English-language method PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) D. Watson, L. Clark and A. Telegen, Ukrainian language version L. Zhdanyuk), the technique “Pressings the student’s educational activity” by M. Kuznetsov. Results. Five typological profiles of academic self-regulation of cadets were obtained – “Autonomous”, “Dependent”, “Moderately dependent”, “Introjected” and “Motivated”. There are statistically significant differences in the indicators of psychological capital among cadets with different typological profiles – “Autonomous profile” cadets have the highest psychological capital, “Motivated” – the lowest. Positive affect in classes is characteristic of cadets with the “Dependent profile” to a greater extent, and the least – with “Motivated”. There were no statistically significant differences in the indicators of learning pressures among cadets with different profiles of academic self-regulation. Conclusions. Academic self-regulation is shown as an important condition for the success of the cadets’ educational and professional activities and their psychological well-being during mastering the future profession, which affects the enrichment of psychological capital and the experience of favorable psychoemotional states in classes that coincide with the purpose of educational activities. The dominance of internal self-regulation and identified regulation has a positive effect on the psychological capital of cadets, on the other hand, low motivation for learning predicts a decrease in affect and psychological capital. Unlike students, cadets’ dominance in the regulatory profile of external regulation has a positive effect on psycho-emotional states at work, which is due to the higher role of external reinforcement in the process of self-organization in their educational and professional activities.

References

1. Кузнєцов М.А. Опитувальник пресингів, пов’язаних з навчальною діяльністю студентів. Харківський осінній марафон психотехнологій : матеріали науково-практичної конференції, м. Харків, 28 жовтня 2017 року. М-во освіти і науки України, ХНПУ імені Г.С. Сковороди. Харків, 2017. С. 58–59.
2. Кузнєцов М.А., Фоменко К.І., Кузнецов О. Психічні стани студентів у процесі навчально-пізнавальної діяльності. Харків : ХНПУ, 2015. 339 c.
3. Кузнєцов М.А., Фоменко К.І., Жданюк Л.О. Ставлення до навчання студентів з низьким рівнем академічної мотивації : монографія. Харків : Діса плюс, 2019. 154 с.
4. Фоменко К. І. Self-regulation of labor activity: the means of psychodiagnostics and the role in motivation. Наука і освіта. 2017. № 11. С. 98–104. URL: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.03219.
5. Фоменко К.І. Губристична мотивація: феноменологія, структура, детермінація. Харків : Діса-плюс, 2018. 484 с.
6. Фоменко К.І., Кузнецов О.І. Мотиваційні особливості академічної саморегуляції студентів. Проблеми сучасної психології : збірник наукових праць Кам’янець-Подільського університету імені Івана Огієнка. 2014. Вип. 25. С. 582–596.
7. Фоменко К.І. Імпліцитні теорії інтелекту й особистості у зв’язку з губристичною мотивацією в студентів. Науковий вісник ХДУ. Психологічні науки. 2016. Т. 2. Вип. 5. С. 71–75.
8. Юдіна Н.О., Тесленко Н.Н. Усвідомлена саморегуляція навчальної діяльності студентів як проблема сучасної психології. Науковий вісник ХДУ. Психологічні науки. 2017. Т. 2. Вип. 3. С. 90–94.
9. Яцюк М.В. Адаптація опитувальника академічної саморегуляції Р.М. Райана і Д.Р. Коннелла (Casual dimensionscale IISQR-A). Практична психологія та соціальна робота. 2008. Вип. 4. С. 45–47.
10. Alessandri G., Consiglio C., Luthans F., Borgogni L. Testing a dynamic model of the impact of psychological capital on work engagement and job performance. Career Development International, 2018. Vol. 23 (1). P. 33–47.
11. Harms P.D., Krasikova D.V., Luthans F. Not Me, But Reflects Me: Validating a Simple Implicit Measure of Psychological Capital. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2018, 100 (5). P. 551–562.
12. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 2008. Vol. 49. P. 182–185. 13. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York : Plenum, 1985. 371 p.
14. Fomenko K., Khomulenko T., Kramchenkova V., Kuznetsov O., Arabadzhy T., Rochniak A., Kostikova I., Viediernikova T., Diomidova N., Scherbakova O., Kovalenko M. Effect of young basketball players’ self-regulation on their psychological indicators. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 2020. Vol. 20 (3), Art 219. Р. 1606–1612. URL: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.03219.
15. Lukova S.V., Zhyvotovska L.V., Kolomiytsev H.А., Fomenko K.I., Beseda N.A. Empirical research on the features of psychoemotional states of adolescent athletes during quarantine restrictions. Wiadomosci lekarskie, 2021. Vol. 55(7). Р. 75(5 pt 2). P. 1347–1351. URL: https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202205222.
16. Luthans F., Youssef C.M., Avolio B.J. Psychological capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 256. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001.
17. Ryan R. & Deci E. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000. Vol. 25. Р. 54–67.
18. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2020. 61. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cedpsych.2020.101860.
19. Urhahne D., Wijnia L. Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review. 2023. 35. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9.
20. Watson D. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988. Vol. 54(6). Р. 1063–1070.
Published
2023-06-01
Pages
39-46
Section
SECTION 2 PEDAGOGICAL AND AGE PSYCHOLOGY