PSYCHOLOGICAL NATURE OF DIETARY BEHAVIOR’S SELF-REGULATION BY WOMEN
Keywords:
dietary behavior, self-management, self-regulation, food dependence, personality
Abstract
The concept of embodied self-regulation is introduced to explain the role played by bodily states in self-control. The hot–cold decision triangle is presented. Therefore a new model is proposed the high–low embodied
decision matrix, which also considers the level of embodiment of a deliberating system. Consumers focused on long-term goals while taking into account their bodily states are more likely to adopt healthier behaviors.
The positive cross-correlation connection between food dependence and restrictive food behavior is found. It proves that disorders of food behavior have general intrapersonal basis, and psychotherapy influences must be built with taking into account of position of integral personality
References
1. Лапина Ю. Тело, еда, секс и тревога: Что беспокоит современную женщину. Исследование клинического психолога. М.: Альпина нон-фикшн, 2018. 229 с.
2. Нардонэ Дж., Вербиц Т., Миланезе Р. В плену у еды: булимия, анорексия, vomiting. Краткосрочная терапия нарушений пищевого поведения / Пер. с итал. О.Е. Игошиной. М.: Генезис, 2016. 320 с.
3. Armitage C. Evidence that implementation intentions reduce fat intake: a randomized trial. Health Psychology. 2004. № 23. С. 319–323.
4. Gollwitzer P., Bayer U., McCulloch K. The control of the unwanted. Unintended Thought. New York: Guilford, 2005. С. 485–515.
5. Gummeson L. Predicting intentions and behaviour of Swedish 10–16 year olds at breakfast. Food Quality and Preference. 1997. № 8. С. 297–306.
6. Hoorens V., Buunk B. Social comparison of health risks: locus of control, the person positivity bias, and unrealistic optimism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1993. № 23. С. 291–302.
7. Oenema A. Exploring the occurrence and nature of comparison of one’s own perceived dietary fat intake to that of self-selected others. Appetite. 2003. № 41. С. 259–264.
8. Promoting healthy diet and exercise patterns amongst primary school children: a qualitative investigation of parental perspectives / K. Hart, A. Herriot, J. Bishop, H. Truby // Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2003. № 16. С. 89–96.
9. Weinstein N. Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology. 1993. № 12. С. 324–333.
2. Нардонэ Дж., Вербиц Т., Миланезе Р. В плену у еды: булимия, анорексия, vomiting. Краткосрочная терапия нарушений пищевого поведения / Пер. с итал. О.Е. Игошиной. М.: Генезис, 2016. 320 с.
3. Armitage C. Evidence that implementation intentions reduce fat intake: a randomized trial. Health Psychology. 2004. № 23. С. 319–323.
4. Gollwitzer P., Bayer U., McCulloch K. The control of the unwanted. Unintended Thought. New York: Guilford, 2005. С. 485–515.
5. Gummeson L. Predicting intentions and behaviour of Swedish 10–16 year olds at breakfast. Food Quality and Preference. 1997. № 8. С. 297–306.
6. Hoorens V., Buunk B. Social comparison of health risks: locus of control, the person positivity bias, and unrealistic optimism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1993. № 23. С. 291–302.
7. Oenema A. Exploring the occurrence and nature of comparison of one’s own perceived dietary fat intake to that of self-selected others. Appetite. 2003. № 41. С. 259–264.
8. Promoting healthy diet and exercise patterns amongst primary school children: a qualitative investigation of parental perspectives / K. Hart, A. Herriot, J. Bishop, H. Truby // Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2003. № 16. С. 89–96.
9. Weinstein N. Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology. 1993. № 12. С. 324–333.
Published
2018-10-29
Pages
9-15
Section
SECTION 1 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY
