THE AWARENESS OF THE PARENTAL POSITION AS A FACTOR OF THE STUDENT YOUTH’S INTERNALITY
Abstract
The aim of the study is to establish the relationship between the youth's ideas about the style of family upbringing in the parental family and the indicators of general internality as the ability to take responsibility for the results and consequences of their activities. The scientific approach to the construction of life projects by E.V. Cherny, O.R.Tuchina has been taken as a basis. According to the authors' opinion, there is a bipolar model of the human life determination, where one pole is repressiveness as a set of the potential or actual practices, and technologies, which oppress or carry a threat to suppress a person, their subjectivity, individuality, freedom, the other pole is permissiveness (Engl. permission – to allow). The research methods have been applied: The methodology ‘The level of subjective control’ (E.F. Bazhin, L.M. Etkind); The questionnaire ‘The styles of parental attitude: repressiveness/permissiveness’ (E.V. Chernyi). The results. It has been established that the concepts ‘type of family upbringing’, ‘style of parental attitude’, and ‘parental position’ are close in content. The style of parental attitude is an integral multi-dimensional formation, in which the emotional component is highlighted (feeling attitude towards the child), the cognitive component (the idea of the child, of oneself as parents, of the family situation in general), the behavioral component reflects the readiness for certain actions, and real actions towards the child. The conclusions. It has been found out that the student youth's ideas about the upbringing style in the parental family are related to the indicator of general internality at a statistically significant level; that is, the young people, who believe that they were brought up in an open, partnership, trusting atmosphere, to a greater extent in adulthood, are able to take responsibility for their actions, their results and consequences.
References
2. Волкова Е.В., Разина Т.В. Взаимосвязь стиля родительского воспитания с развитием волевых качеств личности в юношеском возрасте. Образовательные науки и психология. 2017. № 3(45). С. 106–115.
3. Володарська Н.Д., Карабаєва І.І. Вплив емоційних зв’язків на розвиток психологічного благополуччя сім’ї. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: Психологічні науки. 2021. Вип. 3. С. 29–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2312-3206/2021-3-4
4. Казібекова В.Ф. Динаміка професійних і життєвих цінностей студентів впродовж навчання у закладі вищої освіти. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: Психологічні науки. 2021. Вип. 3. С. 37–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2312-3206/2021-3-5
5. Тавровецька Н.І. Формування уявлення про розподіл ролей в сім’ї сучасною молоддю. Проблеми сучасної психології: науковий журнал. Запоріжжя : Видавничий дім «Гельветика», 2021. № 2(21). С. 89–96.
6. Сапогова Е.Е. Жизненный опыт в автобиографических нарративах личности. Вопросы психологии. 2014. № 1. С. 68–79.
7. Сохань Л.В. Концепция жизнетворчества. 2011. URL: http: // www.gumer.info (дата обращения: 18.06.2022).
8. Шнейдер Л.Б. Основы семейной психологии : учебное пособие для вузов. 3-е изд. Москва : МПСИ, 2010. 928 с.
9. Чепелева Н.В. Самопроектирование личности в дискурсивном пространстве. Человек, субъект, личность в современной психологии. Материалы Международной научной конференции, посвященной 80-летию А.В. Брушлинского, 10-11 октября 2013 года, Москва. Москва : Издательство «Институт психологии РАН», 2013. С. 342–345.
10. Черный Е.В., Тучина О.Р. Исследование жизненных проектов молодежи Крыма. Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета имени В.И. Вернадского. Социология. Педагогика. Психология. 2020. Т. 6(72). № 3. С. 127–148.
11. Эриксон, Э. Идентичность: юность и кризис : монография ; пер. с англ. ; общ. ред. и предисл. А.В. Толстых. Москва : Прогресс, 1996. 394 с.
12. Яблонська Т.М. Розвиток ідентичності дитини в системі сімейних взаємин. Суми : Вид-во СумДПУ ім. А.С. Макаренка, 2013. 444 с.
13. Barber B.K., Stolz H.E., Olsen J.A. Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 2005. Vol. 70(4). pp. 1–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00365.x
14. Barnes G.M., Hoffman, J.H., and Welte J.W. Effects of Parental Monitoring and Peer Deviance on Substance Use and Delinquency. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2006. Vol. 68 (4), pp. 1084–1104.
15. Berkien M., Louwerse A., Verhulst F., Van der Ende J. Children’s perceptions of dissimilarity in parenting styles are associated with internalizing and externalizing behavior. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012. Vol. 21, pp. 79–85. doi:10.1007/s00787-011-0234-9
16. Hoeve M., Dubas J.S., Gerris J.R.M., Van der Laan P.H., Smeenk W. Maternal and paternal parenting styles: Unique and combined links to adolescent and early adult delinquency. Journal of Adolescence. 2011. Vol. 34, pp. 813–827.
17. Karmakar R. The impact of perception of consistency and inconsistency in parenting style on pro-social motives of adolescents. Sotsial'naia psikhologiia I obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2017. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 101–115. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.). doi:10.17759/sps.2017080207
18. Kochanska G., Aksan N., Joy M.E. Children’s fearfulness as a moderator of parenting in early socialization: two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology. 2007. Vol. 43(1), pp. 222–237.
19. Lam C.M. Prosocial involvement as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. Journal of Alternative Medicine Research. 2012. Vol. 5(10), pp. 1–8, doi: org/10.1100/2012/769158
20. Singer J. A. Narrative identity and meaning making across the adult lifespan: An introduction. Journal of Personality. 2004. No 72 (3). P. 437–459.
