CONCEPTUAL CONTENT OF THE CATEGORY “CONSCIOUSNESS” IN FOREIGN PSYCHOLOGY

Keywords: consciousness, definition, eclecticism, reductionism, scientific discussion

Abstract

Purpose. The article is devoted to the problem of defining the term “consciousness” in psychology. The aimof the study is to identify the peculiarities of interpretations of the concept of “consciousness” in psychology.Methods. The study used general scientific methods: methodological and theoretical analysis, synthesis,comparison, and generalization. The criterion for the selection of materials was the influence of scientificsources on the development of discussion among scientists.Results. Consciousness as one of the central psychological phenomena has almost a hundred differentinterpretations. In retrospect, scholars’ views ranged from a complete denial of the existence of consciousnessas a phenomenon to its metaphorical understanding (metaphor of projector light, flow, or wind). The currentstandard of development of the problem will take into account that consciousness as a psychological concept isabstract. It represents a common term, which often serves to identify a group of mental phenomena. The mostcommon terms that define consciousness are “information”, “experience” and “state”. The main problematicsof consciousness can be divided into three categories: description, explanation, and functional problems. Onecan distinguish two main approaches to study consciousness: material and immaterial.Conclusions. The process of finding a common interpretation is far from complete, given the increase ininformation on the subject of research each year. The critical analysis of the conceptual content of the category“consciousness” indicates significant contradictions in the definitions and approaches to it. There are two opposite tendencies in the constructs of the description of consciousness: eclecticism and reductionism,which respectively consider consciousness either too broadly or too narrowly. The author’s own interpretationof consciousness as a mental state, which is characterized by the experience of subjective experienceand purposeful, conscious behavior, which provides its increased flexibility and complexity.

References

1. Аллахвердов В. М. Сознание как парадокс : монографія. Санкт-Петербург : Издательство ДНК, 2000. 528 с.
2. Аллахвердов В. М. Проблема сознания. Поиск путей решения. Мир психологии. 2018. № 2. С. 11–21.
3. Зинченко В. П., Мещеряков Б. Г. Большой психологический словарь. Москва : АСТ, 2008. 409 с.
4. Синявський В. В., Сергєєнкова О. П. Психологічний словник / ред. Н. Побірченко. Київ : Наук. світ, 2007. 336 с.
5. Banks W. P. Evidence for consciousness. Consciousness and cognition: an International Journal. 1995. Vol. 4. №. 2. P. 270–272.
6. Barušs I. Metanalysis of definitions of consciousness. Imagination, cognition and personality. 1987. Vol. 6. №. 4. P. 321–329.
7. Birch J. In search of the origins of consciousness. Acta biotheoretica. 2020. Vol. 68. № 2. P. 287–294.
8. Colman A. M. A dictionary of psychology. 4th ed. New York : Oxford University Press, 2015. 883 p.
9. Consciousness: new concepts and neural networks / T. Zhao et al. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience. 2019. № 13. 302 p.
10. Crick F. Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral cortex. 1998. Vol. 8. №. 2. P. 97–107.
11. Dehaene S., Lau H., Kouider S. What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Robotics, AI, and humanity /ed. by J. von Braun et al. 2021. P. 43–56.
12. Dennett D.C. Facing up to the hard question of consciousness. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: biological sciences. 2018. Vol. 373. № 1755. 20170342.
13. Disorders of consciousness / B. C. Eapen et al. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics. 2017. Vol. 28. № 2. P. 245–258.
14. Gross M. Elements of consciousness in animals. Current biology. 2013. Vol. 23. № 22. P. 981–983.
15. Kammerer F. How rich is the illusion of consciousness? Erkenntnis. 2019. P. 1–17. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00204-4 (дата звернення: 11.02.2022).
16. Karunakaran R. Mathematical modeling of consciousness: a foundation for information processing. International conference on emerging technological trends (ICETT) : матеріали Міжнар. наук. конф, Kollam, 21–22 October 2016. Kollam, 2016. P. 1–4.
17. Kumar K. R. Mathematical modeling of consciousness: subjectivity of mind. International conference on circuit, power and computing technologies : матеріали Міжнар. наук. конф, Nagercoil, 18–19 March 2016. Nagercoil, 2016. P. 1–5.
18. Maher C. Experiment rather than define. Trends plant sci. 2020. Vol. 25. № 3. P. 213–214.
19. Maier A., Tsuchiya N. Growing evidence for separate neural mechanisms for attention and consciousness. Attention, perception, & psychophysics. 2021. Vol. 83. № 2. P. 558–576.
20. Matsumoto D. E. The Cambridge dictionary of psychology. Cambridge University Press, 2009. 608 p.
21. Origin and evolution of human consciousness / F. Fabbro et al. Progress in brain research. 2019. Vol. 250. P. 317–343.
22. Owen A. M. The search for consciousness. Neuron. 2019. Vol. 102. № 3. P. 526–528.
23. Phillips I. The methodological puzzle of phenomenal consciousness. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: biological sciences. 2018. Vol. 373. № 1755. 20170347.
24. Proudfoot M., Lacey A. R. The Routledge dictionary of philosophy. 4th ed. Routledge, 2009. 464 p.
25. Rosenthal D. Concepts and definitions of consciousness. Encyclopedia of consciousness. 2009. P. 157–169.
26. Theoretical models of consciousness: a scoping review / D. Sattin et al. Brain sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. № 5. 535.
27. Van Gulick R. Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness/#ConCon (дата звернення: 11.02.2022).
28. VandenBos R. APA dictionary of psychology. 2nd ed. Washington : American Psychological Association, 2015. 1024 p.
29. Velmans M. How to define consciousness: and how not to define consciousness. Journal of consciousness studies. 2009. Vol. 16. № 5. P. 139–156.
30. Vimal R. Meanings attributed to the term ‘consciousness’: an overview. Journal of consciousness studies. 2009. Vol. 16. № 5. P. 9–27.
Published
2022-05-06
Pages
11-17
Section
SECTION 1 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY