PREDICTORS OF RESILIENCE AND OPTIMISM AMONG PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT AGES DURING THE SARS-COV-2 PANDEMIC

Keywords: resilience, optimism, resources, pandemic, adaptation, youth, adulthood

Abstract

The aim is to summarize research on resilience and optimism during the various stages of the SARS-СOV-2 pandemic and to identify predictors that determine these resources for resilience and self-regulation.Methods used are the following: theoretical (analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, generalization,systematization of scientific literature on the study of resources of personal stability in difficult life situations);empirical CD-RISC-10 method developed on the basis of CD-RISC K. Conner, J. Davidson to determinethe level of resilience (adapted by Z. Kireeva, O. Odnostalko, B. Biron); Life Orientation Test (LOT) developedby psychologists S. Carver and M. Scheier to measure optimism as a trait (adapted by T. Gordeeva, O. Sychova,E. Osina); questionnaire of temperament structure (OST, V. Rusalov), in particular indices of formal-dynamicproperties of a person; questionnaires; methods of mathematical statistics: descriptive statistics, correlation,factorial and regression analysis. Results. It has been determined that subjective cognitive assessments of the situation change from “Nothingspecial” and “Psychologically difficult situation” to “Dangerous situation” during the pandemic and quarantinemeasures. The existence of statistical differences in levels of resilience and optimism depending on age has beendemonstrated. It is observed that the number of those who had a high level of resilience decreases (p <0.05)by the third month from the beginning of quarantine, which was imposed during the pandemic. Optimismand resilience have been found to be interrelated resources. It is stated that with age, resilience and optimismin an atypical situation requires the involvement of more predictors, because only positive expectations are notenough.Conclusion. It was determined that resilience combines the past (reflection on past living experiencesand overcoming difficult life situations), present (awareness of new circumstances, their conditionand transformation of patterns of behavior in difficult conditions of the present) and future (positive expectationsin the future, even unrealistic or ostentatious) in middle adulthood.

References

1. Аргайл М. Психология счастья. Санкт-Петербург, 2003. 271 с.
2. Ваништендаль С. «Резильентность» или оправданные надежды. Раненый, но не побежденный. Женева : Бисе, 1998. 80 с.
3. Кіреєва З. О. Проявлення феномену «неpеаліcтичного оптимізму» у cтудентcьких репрезентаціях-проєктуваннях життєвого шляху. Віcник Одеcького національного універcитету Т. 17. Вип. 5. Cерія «Пcихологія». 2012. C. 48–57.
4. Односталко О. С., Кіреєва З. О., Бірон Б. В. Психометричний аналіз адаптованої версії Шкали резильєнтності (cd-risc-10). Габітус. 2020. № 14. С. 110–117.
5. Селигман М. Новая позитивная психология: Научный взгляд на счастье и смысл жизни. София, 2006. 368 с.
6. Титаренко Т. М. Психологічне здоров’я особистості: засоби самодопомоги в умовах тривалої травматизації : монографія. Національна академія педагогічних наук України, Інститут соціальної та політичної психології. Кропивницький : Імекс-ЛТД, 2018. 160 с.
7. Хамініч О. М. Резильєнтність: життестійкість, життєздатність або Резильєнтність? Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія «Психологічні науки». Вип. 6. Т. 2. 2016. С. 160–165.
8. Carver С.S., Gaines J.G. Optimism, pessimism, and postpartum depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1987. Vol. 11. №. 4. P. 449–462.
9. Connor K. M., Davidson J. R. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Depression and Anxiety. 2003. №. 18. P. 76.
10. Hobfoll S. E. Conservation of resources theory: its implication for stress, health, and resilience. In The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping / ed. S. Folkman, pp. 127–47. New York : Oxford Univ. Press. 2011.
11. Hobfoll S. E. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General psychology. 2002. Vol. 6. № 4. P. 307–324.
12. Rossouw P. Resilience: A neurobiological perspective. Neuropsychotherapy in Australia. 2015. March/May. №. 31. Рр. 3–8.
13. Weinstein Neil D. Unrealistic Optimism: About Susceptibility in Health Problems: Conclusions from a Community-Wide Sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1987. № 10(5). Рp. 481–500.
Published
2022-05-06
Pages
5-10
Section
SECTION 1 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY