PSYCHO-EMOTIONAL STATE OF STUDENTS UNDER DISTANCE LEARNING

Keywords: mental state, emotional state, emotional intelligence, distance learning, students, higher education institutions

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to theoretically substantiate and empirically investigate the psycho-emotionalstate of students under distance learning in higher education institutions.Methods. A set of research methods are used in order to achieve the goal: a) theoretical – analysis, synthesis,comparison, generalization and systematization of obtained results; b) empirical – observation, conversation,psychodiagnostic techniques: a technique of “Self-assessment of mental states” by H. Eysenck – to determinethe indicators of mental states of students (anxiety, frustration, aggression, rigidity); a research techniqueof emotional intelligence by G. Hall – to determine the indicators and level of development of emotionalintelligence in students; test “Pre-examination well-being” (modification of the technique of S.I. Boltivets) – tostudy the psychological readiness for passing exams and pre-examination well-being of students; c) mathematicaland statistical data processing – descriptive statistics (finding the levels and frequency of expression of the traitin percent), linear correlation analysis by Pearson. Results. The study involved 80 students enrolled in 1st–2nd year of Master’s degree program at TernopilVolodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. The age of the respondents is 21–25 years. The studywas carried out during 2020–2021.It was found out that under distance learning, a third part of students have a high level of anxiety, frustration,aggression. They experience anxiety, confusion, worrying, disillusion associated with prolonged socialisolation, online learning, virtual communication with teachers and peers. More than half of students havean average level of the development of emotional intelligence therefore they are not always able to correctlyrecognize, understand and deal with emotions. Under distance learning half of the students showed an averagelevel of psychological readiness for the exam and not entirely good pre-examination well-being. They areemotionally tense before the exam, often feel fear, lack of self-confidence in themselves and their knowledge.Conclusions. It was found out that under distance learning psycho-emotional state of students significantlydeteriorates. Thereby, teachers need to create favorable conditions for students to study, taking into considerationtheir individual psychological characteristics, to provide them with psychological support.

References

1. Блинова О.Є., Каленчук В.О. Особистісні чинники психологічної безпеки студентів закладів вищої освіти. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія «Психологічні науки». 2018. Вип. 5. С. 154–160.
2. Грицук О.В. Емоційні стани здобувачів вищої освіти під час навчальних занять. Теоретичні і прикладні проблеми психології. 2020. № 2. С. 288–299.
3. Ильин Е.П. Эмоции и чувства. Санкт-Петербург : Питер, 2001. 752 с.
4. Кічук А.В. Деякі особливості змін у психоемоційному здоров’ї студентів та факторів, які їх обумовлюють при карантинних обмеженнях. Теоретичні і прикладні проблеми психології. 2020. № 3 (53). Т. 3. С. 5–18.
5. Кузнєцов М.А., Фоменко К.І., Кузнецов О.І. Психічні стани студентів у процесі навчально-пізнавальної діяльності : монографія. Харків : ХНПУ, 2015. 338 с.
6. Левитов Н.Д. О психических состояниях человека. Москва : Просвещение, 1964. 344 с.
7. Подоляк Л.Г., Юрченко В.І. Психологія вищої школи : практикум. Київ : Каравела, 2008. 336 с.
8. Прохоров А.О. Психические состояния и их проявления в учебном процессе. Казань : Изд-во Казанского ун-та, 1991. 167 с.
9. Райгородский Д.Я. Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты. Самара : Издательский дом «БАХРАМ–М», 2001. 672 с.
10. Шпак М.М. Психологічні особливості розвитку емоційного інтелекту в студентському віці. Pedagogical and psychological science and education: transformation and development vectors : collective monograph. Riga, Latvia : «Baltija Publishing», 2021. Vol. 2. P. 342–359.
11. Щербатых Ю.В. Экзаменационный стресс. Воронеж : ИАН, 2000. 120 с.
12. Extremera N., Rey L. Ability emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: Positive and negative affect as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016. Vol. 102. P. 98–101.
13. Karim J. Emotional Intelligence and Psychological Distress: Testing the Mediatory Role of Affectivity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2009. Vol. 4. P. 20–39.
14. COVID-Related Functional Difficulties and Concerns Among University Students During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Binational Perspective. Journal of Community Health / M. Schiff et al. October, 2020. P. 1–9.
Published
2021-12-01
Pages
115-121
Section
SECTION 2 PEDAGOGICAL AND AGE PSYCHOLOGY