FEATURES OF EXPERIENCING A SENSE OF SECURITY BY PARTICIPANTS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Abstract
Purpose. Investigation of the peculiarities of psychophysiological characteristics of experiencing a senseof security by participants in the educational process in the process of introducing distance learning.Methods. A narrowly directed questionnaire was used developed by a team of specialists in the fieldof psychology. Its structure consisted of collecting general information; study of the features of the organizationof distance learning and associative ideas about the full-time and distance forms of the educational process(a list of associations to the words-stimuli “distance learning” and “full-time education”); determinationof the subjective level of personal safety in various forms of organization of the educational process: inan offline and online environment (5 point scaling: 1 – absolutely safe, 5 – absolutely dangerous environment).Results. There is a contextual significance of the conditions in which the individual feels protected. Theorganization of educational in a situation of transformation produces new risks and is perceived as a threat. The vast majority of respondents consider distance and face-to-face learning to be safe. The same percentageof respondents as distance learning consider full-time education unequivocally dangerous. It has been foundthat there is a significant direct link between a sense of security in online and offline learning.Conclusions. It was determined that the subjects who feel dangerous in the educational process feel insecurein any form of training organization. It is shown that respondents who felt comfortable in the traditional formof education will feel some anxiety and require a certain amount of time to adapt to new conditions. It has been proventhat distance learning is predominantly perceived as a negative phenomenon that requires a change in the usual orderof life. Face-to-face learning is associated with habitual behaviors that are generally perceived as comfortable.A group of associations is identified, which reflects the reflection of the psychophysiological statesof the respondents during distance and full-time education. The peculiarity of the representations that areattributed to the group of “psychophysiological” is due to the educational situation in which the participantsof the educational process find themselves. Two subgroups have been identified, which are characterized as“somatic” and “psychosomatic” manifestations.
References
2. Вітюк Н. Кібербулінг як загроза психологічній безпеці особистості школяра. Вісник Прикарпатського університету. Філософські і психологічні науки. 2015. № 19. С. 129–138.
3. Гаврищак Л. Інформаційно-психологічна безпека особистості у сучасному світі. Проблеми гуманітарних наук. Серія: Психологія. 2012. № 29. С. 100–110.
4. Литвинчук А.І. Психологічні особливості уявлень про небезпеку осіб, які проживають у сільській місцевості. Наукові перспективи. 2021. № 4 (10). С. 369–377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2021-4(10)-369-377 (дата звернення 03.08.2021).
5. Мельник О. Громадяни України про безпеку: особисту, національну та її складові. Результати другого загальнонаціонального соціологічного дослідження. 2017. 91 с. URL: https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/2017-SURVEY%202-DCAF-UKR.pdf (дата звернення 10.08.2021).
6. Панченко Т.Л. Психологічна безпека інклюзивного освітнього середовища. Науковий часопис НПУ імені МП Драгоманова. Серія 19: Корекційна педагогіка та спеціальна психологія. 2014. № 28. С. 327–332.
7. Слюсаревський М.М. Психологічна безпека людини в онтологічному і гносеологічному вимірах. Післямова до роботи, відзначеної Державною премією України в галузі науки та техніки. Наукові студії з соціальних та політичних наук. 2020. С. 7–26.
8. Тушина О. Психологічна безпека в загальноосвітньому навчальному закладі : практичний посібник. Запоріжжя : ЗОІППО, 2013.
9. Харченко А.С. Психологічна безпека особистості викладача вишу. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ. серія психологічна. 2012. № 2 (2). С. 443–450.
10. Media psychophysiology and neuroscience: Bringing brain science into media processes and effects research. Media effects: Advances in theory and research / P.D. Bolls et al. 2019. P. 195–210.
11. Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: the critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology / B.H. Bradley et al. 2012. № 97 (1). P. 151.
12. Edmondson A.C. Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, ed. RM Kramer, KS Cook. New York : Russell Sage, 2004. Р. 239–272.
13. Edmondson A.C. The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
14. Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology / M.L. Frazier et al. 2017. № 70 (1). P. 113–165. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183 (дата звернення 15.07.2021).
15. From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning. Human Relations / J.F. Harvey et al. 2019. № 72 (11). P. 1726–1751.
16. Leader humility and team creativity: the role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. Journal of Applied Psychology / J. Hu et al. 2018. № 103 (3). P. 313.
17. Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization / B. Javed et al. 2019. № 25 (1). P. 117–136.
18. Kim S., Lee H., Connerton T.P. How psychological safety affects team performance: mediating role of efficacy and learning behavior. Frontiers in psychology. 2020. № 11. P. 1581.
19. Newman A., Donohue R., Eva N. Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review. 2017. № 27 (3). P. 521–535.
20. O’Donovan R., McAuliffe E. A systematic review exploring the content and outcomes of interventions to improve psychological safety, speaking up and voice behaviour. BMC health services research. 2020. № 20 (1). P. 1–11.
21. Soares André Escórcio, Lopes Miguel Pereira. Social networks and psychological safety: A model of contagion. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM) [ISSN:] 2013-0953 7. 2014. № 5. Р. 995–1012. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/188640 (дата звернення 18.08.2021).