SELF-CONTROL IN SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE OF DEVELOPMENT OF EMOTIONAL RESILIENCE OF AN INDIVIDUAL
Abstract
The objective of the article is to define and substantiate potential influence of self-control on the development of emotional resilience in social-psychological assistance of individuals who are dealing with the consequences of traumatic events. Research methods: theoretical analysis, comparison, systematization, generalization, modelling.
Results. Emotional resilience, as ability to regulation of emotional states and expressions of emotions, is a condition of successful social interaction. At the same time, possibilities of development of emotional resilience in the process of social-psychological assistance are very limited. Hence, arises the task of search of mechanisms of indirect impact on the process. Social-psychological determinants of emotional resilience (emotional stability, peculiarities of self-attitude and goal setting, reflexive experience) have been defined. Potential of self-control as a factor of development of emotional resilience has been outlined. It has been shown that self-control, as a behavioural strategy (model, specific way of reacting, etc.), guarantees effectiveness of solving all life situations. However, the role of self-control is determinative only in emotionally unfavourable situations.
The article presents a list of such situations, describes signs and emotional reactions typical for each of those. Functions of self-control in emotionally unfavourable situations of social interaction (regulatory, protective, compensatory, controlling) have been defined.
Conclusion. Self-control in all its manifestations (as coping, as protection, as special type of social behaviour, as self-controlling intellect) can be an instrument of development of emotional resilience. The broader spectrum of self-control strategies an individual has in his or her active use, the better he or she controls emotional states and manifestations. Perspective of further research is seen in the development and introduction of models of assistance oriented at individual styles of self-regulation of emotional manifestations in the process of interaction with environment. It is also important to highlight diagnostic markers of the ability of an individual to emotional self-regulation and evaluation of situation.
References
2. Белинская Е.П., Вечерин А.В. Адаптация диагностического инструментария: опросник «Проактивный копинг». Социальная психология и общество. 2018. Т. 9. № 3. С. 137–145.
3. Дідух М.М. Стан розвитку компонентів конструктивної копінг-поведінки у працівників органів внутрішніх справ. Зб. наук. праць К-ПНУ ім. І. Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г.С. Костюка НАПН України. Проблеми сучасної психології. 2014. Вип. 26. 2014. С. 129–143. URL: http://problemps.at.ua/ (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
4. Журавлев А.Л., Крюкова Т.Л., Сергиенко Е.А. Совладающее поведение: Современное состояние и перспективы / под ред. А.Л. Журавлева, Т.Л. Крюковой, Е.А. Сергиенко. Москва : Институт психологии РАН, 2008. 474 с.
5. Исаева Е.Р. Копинг-поведение и психологическая защита личности в условиях здоровья и болезни. Санкт-Петербург : СПбГМУ, 2009. 136 c.
6. Либина А.В. Совладающий интеллект: человек в сложной жизненной ситуации. Москва : Эскмо, 2018. 450 с.
7. Малхазов О.Р. Технологія формування емоційної стійкості осіб, що переживають наслідки травматичних подій. Зб. наук. статей «Психологічні науки: проблеми і здобутки». 2018. Вип.2 (12). С. 132–147.
8. Шебанова В.І., Діденко Г.О. Копінг-поведінка у сучасних психологічних дослідженнях. Зб. наук. Праць К-ПНУ імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г.С. Костюка НАПН України. Проблеми сучасної психології. 2018. Вип. 39. С. 368–379. URL: http://problemps.kpnu.edu.ua/en/ (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
9. Хачатурова М.Р. Совладающий репертуар личности: обзор зарубежных исследований. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2013. Т. 10. №. 3. С. 160–169.
10. Baumeister R.F., Crescioni A., & Alquist J.L. Free will as advanced action control for human social life and culture. Neuroethics, 2011. Vol. 4(1), Рр. 1–11.
11. Blum S., Brow M., Silver R.C. Coping. 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00110-5 (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
12. Bowins B. How psychiatric treatments can enhance psychological defense mechanisms. Am J Psychoanal. 2006. Vol. 66, Pp. 173–194. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11231-006-9014-6 (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
13. Carver C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub J.K. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989. Vol. 56. P. 267–283.
14. Drummond S., Brough P. Proactive coping and preventive coping: Evidence for two distinct constructs? Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 92. Pp. 123–127. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.029 (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
15. Eccles J.S., Vida M.N. & Barder B. The Relation of Early Adolescents College Plans and Both Academic Ability and Task-Value Beliefs to Subsequent College Enrollment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 2004. Vol. 1. Pp. 63–77. URL: https://e-libra.su/read/402833-sovladayuschiy-intellekt-chelovek-v-slozhnoy-zhiznennoy-situacii.html 156/161 (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
16. Folkman S., Lazarus R.S. Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology.
1998. Vol. 54. P. 466–475.
17. Grohol J. Common Defense Mechanisms. Psych Central. July 16, 2019. URL: https://psychcentral.com/lib/15-common-defense-mechanisms/ (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
18. Haan N. Coping and defending. Process of self-environment organization. New York : Academic Press, 1977. 360 p.
19. Kroeber T.C. The coping functions of the ego mechanisms. / In R.W. White (Ed.) & K.F. Bruner (Collaborator), The study of lives: Essays on personality in honor of Henry A. Murray Atherton Press. 1963. Pp. 178–198. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/12238-008 (дата звернення: 20.05.2020).
20. Moskowitz J.T. Emotion and coping. / In T.J. Mayne & G.A. Bonanno (Eds.), Emotions and social behavior. Emotions: Current issues and future directions. 2001. Pp. 311–336. Guilford Press.
21. Vaillant G. Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in a positive psychology. American Psychologist. 2000. Vol. 55. No. 1. Pp. 89–98.
22. Weber H. Breaking the rules: Personal and social responses to coping norm-violations. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal. 2003. Vol. 16(2). Pp. 133–153.
