PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CIVIL CONFRONTATION REPRODUCED IN THE UKRAINIAN SEGMENT OF SOCIAL MEDIA
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to identify the psychological effects of civil confrontation, having an impact on the active part of Ukrainian society – users of social media (namely Facebook). The civil confrontation is a process occuring within the civil society as an important part of Ukrainian political process overall, and has being developed in a controversial way. The values’ promotion by “soft power” tools and the competition of discourses are of particular importance in this issue.
Methods. The critical discourse analysis (CDA) was utilized as a research method for the explanation of the of the “message-context” relationship, pointing out the positions of interest groups, and demonstrating the discourses’ interaction. The ethogenic approach provided the effective data work in the circumstances of a strong correlation between the object and the context and of an impossibility of laboratory experiments. Theoretical sampling was used for data collection.
Results. As a result of data analysis, the following psychological effects shaped by the practices of civil confrontation in social media are described: monotony, desensitization, ambivalence and alertness. These effects may be used to divert public attention, change (increase or decrease) the level of protest potential, push impulsive actions, impose conflicting ideas, or stimulate society to changes in values (both in a positive and in a negative ways).
Conclusions. Considering the increasing anomie in the Ukrainian society, the psychological effects may cause a sense of helplessness and exhaustion among citizens, and make the society prone to the various manipulative influences. Consequently, they could be used by interest groups to construct an agenda and establish the dominance of their own discourse at public arenas. Further research in this area should assess the potential impact of psychological practices on different target groups in the short-term and long-term perspective.
References
2. Korniievskyi, O. (2016). Superechnosti suchasnoho rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini [Contradictions of the modern development of civil society in Ukraine]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy – Scientific Notes of the Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies I.F. Kuras, NAS of Ukraine, 3–4, 266–274 [in Ukrainian].
3. Polishchuk, O. (2016). Kliuchovi tsinnosti u hromadianskomu suspilstvi, shcho vyznachaiut napriam rozvytku derzhavy [Key values in civil society that determine the direction of state development]. Relihiia ta sotsium – Religion and Society, 3–4, 9–15 [in Ukrainian].
4. Rybalka, V. (2017). Psykholohichni peredumovy rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva i osobystosti hromadianyna [Psychological prerequisites for the development of civil society and personality of the citizen]. Psykholohiia i osobystist – Psychology and Personality, 2, 50–61 [in Ukrainian].
5. Ivanov, O.I. (2005). Social’naja naprjazhennost’ i social’nyj konflikt [Social tension and social conflict]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 6. Politologija. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 3 – Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 6. Political science. International relations, 24–30 [in Russian].
6. Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C.L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78.
7. Kozyrev, G.I. (2008). “Vrag” i “obraz vraga” v obshhestvennyh i politicheskih otnoshenijah. [“Enemy” and “image of enemy” in social and political relations]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija – Sociology Studies, 7(1), 31–39 [in Russian].
8. Oleshchuk, P.M. (2014). Vplyv sotsialnoi merezhi Facebook na politychnu mobilizatsiiu [The influence of Facebook social network on political mobilization]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk – Gilea: Scientific Bulletin, 88, 336–340 [in Ukrainian].
9. Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.
10. Badmaeva, N.I. (2014). Interaktivnost’ i parasocial’nost’ internet-kommunikacii [Interactivity and parasociality of Internet communication]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pedagogika. Filologija. Filosofija – Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Pedagogy. Philology. Philosophy, 10-2, 125–128 [in Russian].
11. Sabinskaja, O.B. (2007). Subektivnost’ v kachestvennom issledovanii: novye podhody [Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: New Approaches]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija – Sociological Studies, 10, 122–131 [in Russian].
12. Gotlib, A.S. (2012). Subektivnost’ issledovatelja v sociologicheskom issledovanii: paradigmal’nye razlichija [The subjectivity of the researcher in a sociological study: paradigm differences]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Samara State University, 5, 120–125 [in Russian].
13. Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S., & Denzin, N.K. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Califónia: Sage, 117 p.
14. Harré, R. (2015). Positioning theory. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1–9, 129–138.
15. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Vol.10. Cambridge: Polity press, 259 p.
16. Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. Vol. 21. NYU press.
17. Gupta, S. (2015). Role of Industrial Psychology and Monotony in Financial Sector. International Journal for Research in Management, 4:3, 5–12.
18. Zelinska, T. (2001). Ambivalentnist osobystosti yak psykholohichnyi fenomen [The ambivalence of personality as a psychological phenomenon]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and Society, 3 (5), 23–32 [in Ukrainian].
19. Bryant, J. & Thompson, S. (Eds.). (2002). Media effects: A historical perspective. Fundamentals of media effects. Pp. 21–64. Boston: McGraw Hill.
20. Simard, D., & Wong, W. (2001). Alertness, orientation, and detection: The conceptualization of attentional functions in SLA. Studies in second language acquisition, 23(1), 103–124.
21. Kochubeinyk, O.M. (2018). Sotsialna mekhanika vyrobnytstva anomii: dyskursyvnyi vymir [Social mechanics of anomie production: discursive dimension]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii – Scientific Studies in Social and Political Psychology, 4(41), 92–104 [in Ukrainian]
