THE THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE AND DIFFICULTIES IN THERAPY IN THE CONTEXT OF PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FAMILY THERAPISTS

Keywords: family system psychotherapy, personal effectiveness of psychotherapists, “psychotherapist – client” relationships, difficulties in psychotherapy

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of study was to examine the characteristics of the therapeutic relationships among family therapists and identify correlations between these characteristics and therapeutic experiences, generalized attachment style, personality traits, and typical difficulties in the psychotherapy process.

Methods. A battery of psychological questionnaires was used to assess the characteristics of the therapeutic alliance in relation to the therapeutic experience and difficulties in therapy, generalized attachment style, and personality traits: Agnew Relationship Measure, Psychotherapists Common Core Questionnaire, Relationship Quality Self- Assessment by K. Bartholomew and L. Horowitz, Big Five personal questionnaire by R. McCray, P. Costa.

Results. The qualitative and substantive characteristics of the therapeutic alliance significantly correlate with the personal traits and with the type of difficulty in the process of psychotherapy. The duration of psychotherapy education and psychotherapy practice correlates with a better therapeutic alliance. Extroverted therapists with a secure attachment have better understanding of clients’ emotional responses. Other indicators of the quality of the therapeutic alliance: communication, partnership and client initiative significantly correlate with self-control, perseverance, organization, discipline, responsibility, accuracy at work, as well as sociocentrism, emotional stability. The type of self-reported therapy difficulties are different for therapists with different attachment styles. When the type of attachment with a negative attitude to oneself and to others dominates, there will often be difficulties with excessive client expectations and impairment.

Conclusions. The personality traits of family psychotherapists described in the study, attachment style, therapeutic experience predict the quality of the therapeutic alliance, and therefore are important to consider in the professional psychotherapy training or advanced training.

References

1. Balint, M. (1957). The doctor, his patient and the illness. International Universities Press.
2. Baryshneva, S. (2019) Vzaimosvjaz’ predstavlenij o detskom opyte I harakteristik partnerskih otnoshenij u molodyh vzroslyh [The relationship of ideas about childhood experiences and characteristics of partnerships in young adults]. URL: https://nauchkor.ru/uploads/documents/587d366f5f1be77c40d58f1d.pdf [in Russian].
3. Burlachuk, L. & Korolev, D. (2000) Jeksperimental’nye metodiki. Adaptacija oprosnika dlja dіagnostiki pjati faktorov lichnosti [Experimental techniques. Adaptation of the questionnaire for the diagnosis of five personality factors.]. Voprosy psihologii - Psychology Issues, 1, 126 – 140 [in Russian].
4. Dzhonson, S. (2013) Praktika jemocional’no – fokusirovanoj supruzheskoj terapii. Sozdanie svjazej [The practice of emotionally focused marital therapy. Creating Links]. – M.: Nauchnyjmir, 364 [in Russian].
5. Kochjunas, R. (2008) Osnovy psihologicheskogo konsul’tirovanija [The Basics of Psychological Counseling]. M.: “Akademicheskij proekt”, 150 [in Russian].
6. Agnew-Davies, R. & Stiles, W.(1998) Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM). British Journal of Clinical Pychology, 37, 155-172.
7. Black S., Hardy G., Turpin, G. & Parry G.(2005) Self-reported attachment styles and therapeutic orientation of therapists and their relationship with reported general alliance quality and problems in therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 363–377.
8. Bordin, E. (1994) Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions // Horvath A., Greenberg L. (Eds.) Wiley series on personality processes. The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons, 13-37.
9. Orlinsky, D., Rennestad, M., Gerin, P., Willutzki U. & Dazord A. (1999). Development of psychotherapists: concepts, questions, and methods of a colaborative international stady. Psychotherapy Research, 9(2), 127-153.
10. Pinsof, W. & Catherall, D. (1986)The integrative psychotherapy alliance: Family, couple and individual therapy scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 137–151.
11. Rait, D. (2000) The therapeutic alliance in couples and family therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 211-224.
12. Rogers, C. (1994). Vzglyad na psihoterapiyu. Stanovlenie cheloveka [On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy]. M. 480 p. [in Russian].
13. Sexton, T. & Whiston, S. (1994) The status of the counseling relationship: An empirical review, theoretical implications, and research directions. The Counseling Psychologist, 22(1), 6–78.
14. Shirk, S. & Saiz, C. (1993) Clinical, empirical, and developmental perspectives on the therapeutic relationship in child therapy. Development and Psychopathology, 713–728.
15. Simionato, G. & Simpson S. (2018) Personal risk factors associated with burnout among psychotherapists: A systematic review of the literature. J Clin Psychol., Sep, 74(9), 1431–1456.
Published
2020-04-02
Pages
195-202