NETWORK OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AS A COPING RESOURCE OF THE PROFESSIONAL SELFACTUALIZATION OF WOMEN
Keywords:
network of social support, professional selfactualization, coping resource, supportive communication, conflict of roles
Abstract
The paper considered the concept of network of social support as an important coping resource of the professional selfactualization of women. There are analyzed the scientist`s researches that concerned the necessity of effective network of social support in the process of woman`s becoming as a professional, mother and wife. It is noted that the presence of an effective network has a positive impact on the women`s psychological health.
References
1. Рыбников В.Ю. Психология копинг-поведения специалистов опасных профессий / В.Ю. Рыбников, Е.Н. Ашанина. – М. : Политехника-сервис, 2012. − 120 с.
2. Schaefer C., Coyne J.C., Lazarus R.S. The health-rated functions of social support. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 4. – 1981. – Р. 381–406.
3. Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress / S. Cobb. – Psychosomatic Medicine, 38. – 1976. – Р. 300–314.
4. Gildea T. Combat vet says gender bias to untreated PTSD / Т. Gildea. – March 30, 2010. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу : from http://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId= 124500733/.
5. MacGeorge E.L, Clark R.A. Gillian S.I. Sex differences in the provision of skillful emotional support: The mediating role of self-efficasy. – Communication Reports, 15. – 2002. – Р. 17–28.
6. S. Jones Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helped competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. – Communication Research, 31. – 2004. – Р. 338–360.
7. Goffman E. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gathering / Е. Goffman. – New York : Free Press, 1963.
8. Stohl C. Organizational communication: connectedness in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. – 1995.
9. Sevim, S.A., 2006. Religious tendency and gender roles: Predictors of the attitudes toward women’s work roles. Soc. Behav. Personal. Intl. J., 34: 77–86.
10. Abdullah, R., S. Jahan and S. Saha Occupational stress, social and family difficulties and job contentment of working women: Bangladesh perspective. Daffodil International University, Bangladesh. – 2008.
11. AL-Hussami, R.N.M., 2008. A study of nurses’ job satisfaction: The relationship to organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, transactional leadership, transformational leadership and level of education. Eu. J. Sci. Res. 22: 286–295.
12. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.
13. Mount M.K., & Barrick, M.R. The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 1995. – Р. 153–200.
14. Berkowitz, A., & Perkins, H. W. Stress among farm women: Work and family as nteracting system s.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 1984. – Р. 161–165.
15. Maryam Zarra-Nezhad, Ali Moazami-Goodarzi, Leila Hasannejad and Khadijeh Roushani Occupational Stress and Family Difficulties of Working Women. – Current Research in Psychology 1 (2), 2010. – Р. 75–81.
16. Hobfoll, S.E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50 (3), 2001. – Р. 337–421.
17. Ten Brummelhuis, L.L., & Bakker, A.B. A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67 (7), 2012. – Р. 545.
18. Miller J.E. Effective support group. Fort wayne, IN: Willowgreen. – 1998.
19. Schutz W. FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. – New York : Rinehart, 1958.
2. Schaefer C., Coyne J.C., Lazarus R.S. The health-rated functions of social support. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 4. – 1981. – Р. 381–406.
3. Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress / S. Cobb. – Psychosomatic Medicine, 38. – 1976. – Р. 300–314.
4. Gildea T. Combat vet says gender bias to untreated PTSD / Т. Gildea. – March 30, 2010. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу : from http://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId= 124500733/.
5. MacGeorge E.L, Clark R.A. Gillian S.I. Sex differences in the provision of skillful emotional support: The mediating role of self-efficasy. – Communication Reports, 15. – 2002. – Р. 17–28.
6. S. Jones Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helped competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. – Communication Research, 31. – 2004. – Р. 338–360.
7. Goffman E. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gathering / Е. Goffman. – New York : Free Press, 1963.
8. Stohl C. Organizational communication: connectedness in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. – 1995.
9. Sevim, S.A., 2006. Religious tendency and gender roles: Predictors of the attitudes toward women’s work roles. Soc. Behav. Personal. Intl. J., 34: 77–86.
10. Abdullah, R., S. Jahan and S. Saha Occupational stress, social and family difficulties and job contentment of working women: Bangladesh perspective. Daffodil International University, Bangladesh. – 2008.
11. AL-Hussami, R.N.M., 2008. A study of nurses’ job satisfaction: The relationship to organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, transactional leadership, transformational leadership and level of education. Eu. J. Sci. Res. 22: 286–295.
12. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.
13. Mount M.K., & Barrick, M.R. The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 1995. – Р. 153–200.
14. Berkowitz, A., & Perkins, H. W. Stress among farm women: Work and family as nteracting system s.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 1984. – Р. 161–165.
15. Maryam Zarra-Nezhad, Ali Moazami-Goodarzi, Leila Hasannejad and Khadijeh Roushani Occupational Stress and Family Difficulties of Working Women. – Current Research in Psychology 1 (2), 2010. – Р. 75–81.
16. Hobfoll, S.E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50 (3), 2001. – Р. 337–421.
17. Ten Brummelhuis, L.L., & Bakker, A.B. A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67 (7), 2012. – Р. 545.
18. Miller J.E. Effective support group. Fort wayne, IN: Willowgreen. – 1998.
19. Schutz W. FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. – New York : Rinehart, 1958.
Published
2019-10-07
Pages
115-119
Section
SECTION 1 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY
